In reply to Eam1:
I suggest you look at https://www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/ which does review some telescopes as well, but perhaps more importantly it (in the reviews and various standalone "articles") explains a lot of the different factors that make the difference between ok, good & stunning optical instruments. This can of course get a bit geeky but at least you'll get a better idea of why scope A costs more than scope B.
Generally, spending more money does one or both of the following:
- Improves the quality (sharpness, brightness, colour fidelity, lack of distortion, etc) of the image
- Gets a bigger scope - and bigger here means a larger objective lens (the one at the opposite end to the eyepiece - not being patronising just don't know your level of knowledge). Bigger objective lens - more glass means more £ - means there's more light coming through so it generally allows higher magnification for the same image quality.
Everybody who's suggested you need to try stuff out before buying are correct, especially if you're forking out £1k (unless you're wealthy enough to not notice £1k in which case why only £1k).
Next thing you need to do is have a good idea of what you want the scope for and how you're likely to use it. It sounds like you've at least partly worked this out - I'm assuming terrestrial spotting scope rather than astronomical, but how portable does it need to be? Another factor to consider with wildlife is field of view - much easier to "acquire" something if you're not looking down a narrow tunnel.
If your budget's £1k and you're looking for a "full size" scope (objective lens 65mm+) I would expect about £100-200 of that to be on a decent tripod, and a good tripod isn't wasted on a "compact" scope although if you want low weight and portability a travel tripod might be more appropriate.
I have a "compact" 60mm scope and travel tripod (one of my criterion was to fit in a small rucksack - 20L) but this shorter "folded up" length means the tripod legs are in 5 sections rather than 4 or 3 and that means thinner sections and less stability - it sucks if it's windy but it's definitely lighter.
Think that's all for now.