Moorland Row Pits Shooters Against Polluters

© Tim Melling

The recent announcement by United Utilities that it will not renew licenses to shoot game birds on its land has prompted a furious backlash from pro-shooting campaign group the Countryside Alliance.

Water company United Utilities owns 56,000 hectares of land in the Pennines and Cumbria, much of it upland catchment areas held to protect the quality of water entering their reservoirs (the less said about the quality of water downstream, the better). This includes large tracts of the Forest of Bowland, the Goyt Valley, Longdendale, and the West Pennines - all prime grouse bothering country.

Red grouse wondering if it's safe to come out yet  © Tim Melling
Red grouse wondering if it's safe to come out yet
© Tim Melling

Around 40% of this land is designated as SSSI (Site of Special Scientific Interest), and following a report from Natural England that found much of this is either in an unfavourable or a declining condition, in recent years the company has been working to improve habitats on their woodland and moorland sites.

In July 2023, as part of an update to land management policies, 6,000 hectares were identified as a specific target for restoring nature and biodiversity.

"On a further 12,000 hectares of land, we began to extend that work to improve catchment resilience including plans to not renew around 20 licenses for game bird shooting as they came to their end" say the company.

This has not gone down well with the Countryside Alliance, who work to defend countryside traditions, as they see them.

"The recent announcement that United Utilities will not be renewing shooting leases on its land, citing water quality concerns, lacks any substantiated evidence" they said.

"It appears to be a diversion tactic to distract attention from their own environmental shortcomings as England's worst polluting water company.

"Under pressure, United Utilities is attempting to sacrifice shooting to cover its own environmental shortcomings. Banning shooting on their land will wreak havoc on biodiversity, conservation efforts, and rural livelihoods."

Users of Twitter (or whatever it's called this week) weighed in with some quality wit:

"So you support interfering with the right of landowners to use their land as they wish if it will negatively impact ecology & biodiversity? Huge if true!" posted one.

Another simply wrote "Don't be silly".

In response to the backlash, the company have promised to engage with affected stakeholders and communities, the corporate equivalent of the long grass.

For the rest of us it may seem more than a little ironic to see an organisation, set up to defend the environmentally indefensible, ripping chunks from a firm that enjoys a dreadful reputation for polluting waterways with sewage, on the basis of one policy that may actually improve the environment.

Has anyone asked what the grouse think?

This post has been read 5,038 times

Return to Latest News

8 Aug, 2023

I'll bet that grouse wished he didn't have a bright red target on his head

8 Aug, 2023

The CA represent very few people, yet constantly claim that they're the mouthpiece for "country folk" - whoever the heck they are. The CA are a backward organisation who say and do nothing when birds of prey are killed on and around grouse moors by people who are probably CA members. As for this childish drivel about "cancelling the countryside" - it's desperate stuff that sounds like the bizarre rantings of some right wing Tory MP about to lose their seat.

UU might be useless when it comes to leaks and sewage, but they've got this one right.

8 Aug, 2023

They have a "Raptor Persecution Priority Delivery Group", if the Conservatives were that brazen they would have a "Priority Abuse of Disabled Citizens Group".

8 Aug, 2023

As their own tagline puts it

"The Countryside Alliance is a campaigning organisation for field sports including hunting, shooting, fishing and rural communities."

Odd how the country folk in general come behind the field "sports".

9 Aug, 2023

100%. They are the worst sort of pretenders and hypocrites when it comes to protecting the countryside.

Cancelling the countryside is such a laughable tagline. There are plenty of better organisations holding the UK's polluting water companies to account, and who actually do have an interest in protecting wildlife and rural communities. Nice article! Edit:,are%20likely%20to%20be%20overestimates

The government currently subsidises shooting to the tune of something between £45 and £84 million via intentional loopholes in agricultural subsidy law. Public money for public good?

More Comments
Loading Notifications...
Facebook Twitter Copy Email