In reply to Anonymous:
> (In reply to chris tan)
>You must look after your gear! Most of it should have fallen apart from U.V. damage by now.
Huh? By gear do you means tents only? Or are you talking about the property of silicone to break down with time from UV?, or are you taking the mickey?, or are you talking rubbish?
> 1. Made in China -
Have you been to a chinese factory? What do you know about the culture surrounding economic development regions in china (mostly used area in china for manufacturing)? How do you know they are fearful of losing their jobs?
> 2. Design. try and see the shapes of the fabric ect..... now look at a new one. Get past the addition of straps, bells and whistles - it's probably the same pack!
Dude, you are smoking serious weed. Yes it is true that originally, modern technical packs began with no hip belts (invented by Yvonne Chouinard circa 1970) and the packs were called monoqueque (mono-cock) (sorry for the spelling if it is wrong). These patterns were amazing three dimensional shapes. Then came the hip belt, hence no more amazing (and expensive) shapes needed, and the introduction of the first commercial packs in a large scale to the market (the packs you site as a reference I assume). Fast forward to late 1990's and far eastern manufacturing makes the ability to use "innefficient" but ergonomic pattern panels to make shapes in totally different ways that challenge even the monoqueque standards of performance. Totally different! But I cannot accept that you even know about this history. Bells and whistles are added because they are requested by end users, letters, testers, and sales people. Design people try to find the balance.
> Clothing got lost, they introduced sooooooo many lines that they didn't have time to really keep the range tight, so it got dated ( on the whole ).
Well done on your logic here. Here is my version:
I got lost, I was so fat I couldn't find my bible so I went to the zoo.
> 3. What are you? Maybe Karrimor should have asked this question. They bought out/shares in other companies and 'expanded'.
Who hasn't? Think VF hasn't expanded? Think Pentland hasn't expanded? Think La Fuma, Mammut, Columbia, Nike, Addidas haven't expanded? It is a sad statement, but to compete in today's world of megalithic corporations (including retail groups in the UK, Europe and USA) brands are forced to band together. When they do it right, with correct funding and management it works and no one says anything. When they get it wrong people blame it on their greed. Perhaps desperate to generate increasing turnover to compensate for the transformation in the UK competition area, karrimor diversified. Maybe wrongly, and under funded. Unless you were on the board, or leading it you don't know jack so shut up.
Posted by a stupid gear lover who wears nothing.