In reply to Martin Hore:
No, not at all. Quite the opposite. If you think so, it was badly phrased. But I thought it clearly meant what I wanted to say, which is that her record has brought on her much suspicion on the grounds that it couldn't possibly be, unless she was unclean. But now, another has surpassed her, which ups the ante for the doubters. If you doubt Radcliffe just because she was so fast, well, do you doubt Kosgei too?
It is a shame that athletic prowess is shrouded in discussions of doping, especially for naive believers like me, but there we are.
I, of course, don't know the truth, nor do most of us. Those who have been close to them know better.