Hi, I've done a lot of summer hiking in the Uk, a bit of winter hiking in Snowdonia and a lot in the southern Alps with peaks around the 3000m mark. I'm also a keen climber, but out of practice due to Covid and Kids (+ more excuses).
All my Alpine peaks to date have been hiked with a couple of cheap fleeces and a cheap waterproof coat (which I rarely use, if ever). Honestly, I've picked good days to climb beforehand, so most of it is just in a T-shirt. Just need a fleece, when sitting around at summits when at the 3000m mark.
I want to start doing higher stuff, in the 4000m+ range, with a view to doing Mt Blanc and Elbrus in the future. With that in mind it's time to invest in a proper hard shell but I want something that will be suitable for my short and longer term goals if possible. I'm looking for budget friendly options here.
But I'm confused by it all.
I was thinking something like a Rab Kangri for now, and when I get higher, invest in a warm down like a Rab Neutrino Pro. These are both way more than I wanted to spend, but it seems the prices are the prices so there we go.
Question is, when it comes to stuff like Mont Bland and Elbrus, would one wear a hard shell over your down, or do you wear one or the other, down for dry/cold, otherwise wear hard shell?
I know down isn't great when compressed. I need to understand the above, as if I get the hard shell now, I need to know how much to oversize it by.
Or do I need to accept that to climb something like Elbrus, I'll need a much warmer hard shell in the future (if I get that far) and the extra spending that comes with it.
I'd rather not buy completely different gear every time I increase altitude goals by 1000m if possible.
Regarding boots, I hike in Scarpa Mantas, and accept for Elbrus (and maybe Month blanc) I will need warmer boots, but that's a problem for another year.
Post edited at 12:53