There are frequently problems with car crime in the Stanage area. DO NOT LEAVE ANY VALUABLES ON DISPLAY IN CARS OR MINIBUSES.
Camper vans are becoming an issue with local residents and farmers as their concerns over human waste (and contamination of water supplies) increase with the number of vans overnighting in the various parking areas and laybys there. Please respect this incredible area and the people living wihin it by not overnighting in campervans at Stanage - a number of formal campsites are available locally including North Lees campsite.
Access restrictions under CRoW sometimes apply to areas north of the causeway, these vary each year - see signing at access points, or check the PDNP website for closure dates.
2023 published closure dates are: - August 29th - 31st; September 1st, 4th-8th, 11th - 15th, 18th - 22nd and 25th - 29th; October 2nd - 5th
These closures do not affect any public rights of way or concessionary paths which remain open.
Dates: 1 May to 30 July
Reason: Nesting Birds
Ring ouzels are nesting on Stanage, Burbage and Bamford this year. The nest sites change quickly and frequently as ring ouzels often have several broods each year with different nest sites for each brood. On site signage will be up around any of the nest sites where climbing may impact on the birds and this is always up to date and accurate.
Stanage from High Neb westwards (and Bamford Edge, Moscar, Derwent & Hallam Moors) has a permenant dog restriction and in addition can be for land management reasons, as allowed under the CRoW Act (which allows the landowner to restrict access for up to 28 days per year). Full details of any restrictions and the areas affected can be found by searching for 'Stanage' on the Natural England open access maps website and scrolling to the restrictions section at the bottom of the page.
These closures do not affect public rights of way (which remain open) or the concessionary paths to Stanage.
Rockfax Description
The wall to the right is climbed direct via long reaches between rounded breaks. Protection is good if you carry plenty of cams. © Rockfax
FA. Gary Gibson 1978.
User | Date | Notes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Thinker01 | 12 May, 2019 |
Show βeta
βeta: Rockfax description re being well protected by cams is dangerously misleading. | βeta? | |
Show beta
βeta: Rockfax description re being well protected by cams is dangerously misleading. |
||||
nick w | 9 Jul, 2007 |
Show βeta
βeta: agree with al the placement where there so much so felt ,dare i say ,vs with a rack of cams | βeta? | |
Show beta
βeta: agree with al the placement where there so much so felt ,dare i say ,vs with a rack of cams |
||||
Si dH | 15 Sep, 2005 |
Show βeta
βeta: Agreed! The description is a wee bit mis-leading in that respect - take lots of cams and expect a few run-outs! Hardish move to start the nnice sustained break-climbing above. | βeta? | |
Show beta
βeta: Agreed! The description is a wee bit mis-leading in that respect - take lots of cams and expect a few run-outs! Hardish move to start the nnice sustained break-climbing above. |
||||
Nick Smith - Climbers | 23 Mar, 2003 |
Show βeta
βeta: Protection is good, but is widely spaced - very few of the horizontal breaks will take gear. | βeta? | |
Show beta
βeta: Protection is good, but is widely spaced - very few of the horizontal breaks will take gear. |
Please Login to view more details on the logged ascents
Grade: HVS 5b ***
(Stanage North)