In reply to graeme jackson:
> It would be nice if they asked if they can share
I was building kit for professional astronomers for a decade. Neither professional nor amateur astronomers ever asked satellite or aviation providers if they could share the sky. Edit: instead they used the cash spend in relatively poor islands to get local government to enact lighting controls and no fly zones for their benefit - very one sided.
> See my reply above. I use deep Sky Stacker and yes, it can mitigate standard satellite trails but Starlink trails and the triple lines of aircraft are too intrusive to be wiped out.
Funny, other people manage to mitigate these, as per my Reddit link above. There’s also enough information from various sources on orbital elements to intelligently schedule observations.
It’s not ideal that people have to work harder to take photographs for hobby interest, but that is tensioned against the undeniable benefits aircraft and satellites including Starlink provide.
What’s needed is a collaborative approach to helping hobbyists mitigate the effects. Part of the problem is Musk’s ongoing descent into weapons grade asshatery but none the less, Starlink is evolving its darkening mitigations and is looking to share that. With good commercial reason - these satellites have clear military value and become clear military targets. Being hard to spot can only be in their interest….
Post edited at 22:57