Restricted Access

There are frequently problems with car crime in the Stanage area. DO NOT LEAVE ANY VALUABLES ON DISPLAY IN CARS OR MINIBUSES.

Camper vans are becoming an issue with local residents and farmers as their concerns over human waste (and contamination of water supplies) increase with the number of vans overnighting in the various parking areas and laybys there. Please respect this incredible area and the people living wihin it by not overnighting in campervans at Stanage - a number of formal campsites are available locally including North Lees campsite

 

Access restrictions under CRoW  sometimes apply to areas north of the causeway, these vary each year - see signing at access points, or check the PDNP website for closure dates.

2023 published closure dates are: - August 29th - 31st; September 1st, 4th-8th, 11th - 15th, 18th - 22nd and 25th - 29th; October 2nd - 5th

 

These closures do not affect any public rights of way or concessionary paths which remain open.

Seasonal Restrictions

Dates: 1 May to 30 July

Reason: Nesting Birds

Ring ouzels are nesting on Stanage, Burbage and Bamford this year. The nest sites change quickly and frequently as ring ouzels often have several broods each year with different nest sites for each brood. On site signage will be up around any of the nest sites where climbing may impact on the birds and this is always up to date and accurate.

Stanage from High Neb westwards (and Bamford Edge, Moscar, Derwent & Hallam Moors) has a permenant dog restriction and in addition can be for land management reasons, as allowed under the CRoW Act (which allows the landowner to restrict access for up to 28 days per year). Full details of any restrictions and the areas affected can be found by searching for 'Stanage' on the Natural England open access maps website and scrolling to the restrictions section at the bottom of the page. 

These closures do not affect public rights of way (which remain open) or the concessionary paths to Stanage.

8m.

Rockfax Description
The thin cracks. Gear is a bit of a fiddle. © Rockfax

FA. Clive Rowland 1961.

Feedback

User Date Notes
Alan James - Rockfax 17 May, 2020 Show βeta
βeta: Needs several small cams and none of them is great.
βeta?
Show beta
βeta: Needs several small cams and none of them is great.
Mutl3y 11 Jun, 2006 Show βeta
βeta: Gibbed off rightward after gettin too high above my last bit of marginal gear. Don't really like this sort of problem...
βeta?
Show beta
βeta: Gibbed off rightward after gettin too high above my last bit of marginal gear. Don't really like this sort of problem...
Souljah 3 Aug, 2005 Show βeta
βeta: I found 3-4 good bits of gear in the crack leading up to the crux, past that there is nothing but its not really required! Good technical moves, keep to the right of the shallow crack but do not be tempted by the twin cracks! A good VS lead in my book
βeta?
Show beta
βeta: I found 3-4 good bits of gear in the crack leading up to the crux, past that there is nothing but its not really required! Good technical moves, keep to the right of the shallow crack but do not be tempted by the twin cracks! A good VS lead in my book
Simon Caldwell 15 Aug, 2004 Show βeta
βeta: I assume you're not supposed to use the left of duo cracks near the top :-( Quite a pleasant route, but a bit of an eliminate as that wretched crack is too close to resist. Can't see how the crux is protected by bomber gear unless a side run is placed (in that crack).
βeta?
Show beta
βeta: I assume you're not supposed to use the left of duo cracks near the top :-( Quite a pleasant route, but a bit of an eliminate as that wretched crack is too close to resist. Can't see how the crux is protected by bomber gear unless a side run is placed (in that crack).
54ms 19 Jul, 2004 Show βeta
βeta: I just fell of the bastard. Pleasently technical my arse!
βeta?
Show beta
βeta: I just fell of the bastard. Pleasently technical my arse!
Stig 18 Nov, 2003 Show βeta
βeta: I agree that some of the gear lower down is a bit dubious but bomber gear protects the crux. More importantly, it's not that thin for slabby 5a, so not 'hard' 5a.
βeta?
Show beta
βeta: I agree that some of the gear lower down is a bit dubious but bomber gear protects the crux. More importantly, it's not that thin for slabby 5a, so not 'hard' 5a.
Monk 13 Jun, 2003 Show βeta
βeta: I soloed it and did think the opportunities for gear were limited. Good moves though.
βeta?
Show beta
βeta: I soloed it and did think the opportunities for gear were limited. Good moves though.
Jon Greengrass 20 Mar, 2003 Show βeta
βeta: Ace technical climbing, Soloed this second go after reversing from what i thought was the crux first time. I'm sure i could have laced it with wires and small friend.
βeta?
Show beta
βeta: Ace technical climbing, Soloed this second go after reversing from what i thought was the crux first time. I'm sure i could have laced it with wires and small friend.
Nick Smith - Climbers 8 Apr, 2002 Show βeta
βeta: Pleasantly technical?? I found it scary with poor gear! Eases a bit in the top half of the route though.
βeta?
Show beta
βeta: Pleasantly technical?? I found it scary with poor gear! Eases a bit in the top half of the route though.

Logged Ascents

800 users have logged this

Guidebooks for Stanage North

Not all climbs appear in all guidebooks 10 users have this on their wishlist

Please Login to view more details on the logged ascents

Voting
High HVS
Mid HVS
Low HVS
High VS
Mid VS
Low VS
High HS
Mid HS
Low HS
Votes cast 114
High 5b
Mid 5b
Low 5b
High 5a
Mid 5a
Low 5a
High 4c
Mid 4c
Low 4c
Votes cast 111
Votes cast 97
Style of Ascent
Lead
Followed
Soloed
Toproped
Bouldered
Not Set
Onsighted
Repeated
Flashed (β)
Dogged
DNF
Redpoint
Ground Up
Not Set
Route of Interest
Gabriel

Grade: VS 4c ***
(Stoney Middleton)

Loading Notifications...