In reply to LeeWood:
This was a lucky find for me and not an area I expected; no indication last year and no reported sightings.
I don’t place perches etc, preferring a natural it is what it is photo as my personal choice. However, in photos 3&4 someone must have placed the branches, though I think they may have been there for while (I saw them last year). In another adjacent loch it was obvious there were two newly pre placed stick for perching this year. The reed is natural and the post itself in photo 2 is actually there holding the water level gauge for the loch though. I cropped to take out the scale as I didn’t like it!
That site has had Kingfishers in the past, but I was told they have been absent for 5 yrs. It is an NNR with hides and there are various areas within where photographers have obviously set up the background (and change it repeatedly), so in this case it was easy to get photos. The Kingfishers were happy to be near the hides and sit for extended periods in between fishing. I’m sure if you go online there will be hundreds or thousands of almost identical photos from that location in the last two weeks. It was incredibly busy with bird photographers being such a gift of a site this year with their return,
Bottom Clinger is aware of the site and how close the Kingfishers came to the hides, and I think that it was in other main loch with the pre placed branches that he took his recently posted Kingfisher photo.