Rockfax Description
A great dyno for the short (probably worth 6c+)...a straightforward reach for the tall. © Rockfax
UKC Logbook Description
For those who can do the reach, this route is much easier.
Ticklists
Feedback
| User | Date | Notes | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lawrence.j.c96 | 3 May |
Show βeta
βeta: Felt a lot harder than 6a | βeta? | |
|
Show beta
βeta: Felt a lot harder than 6a |
||||
| SL77 | 18 Apr |
Show βeta
βeta: Absolute sandbag of a route and is dangerously undergraded, I'm not short and I'm a reasonably strong climber this is at least 6C to anybody and shouldn't be graded at 6A at all | βeta? | |
|
Show beta
βeta: Absolute sandbag of a route and is dangerously undergraded, I'm not short and I'm a reasonably strong climber this is at least 6C to anybody and shouldn't be graded at 6A at all |
||||
| liamhughes1981 | 31 Aug, 2020 |
Show βeta
βeta: 7a in the old book! | βeta? | |
|
Show beta
βeta: 7a in the old book! |
||||
| Ian Ford | 7 Jul, 2019 |
Show βeta
βeta: Definitely not 6a or as in the book. Probably around 6c Being tall wouldn’t drop it to 6a either. | βeta? | |
|
Show beta
βeta: Definitely not 6a or as in the book. Probably around 6c Being tall wouldn’t drop it to 6a either. |
||||
Logged Ascents
106 users have logged this
Guidebooks for Australia
Not all climbs appear in all guidebooks
Please Login to view more details on the logged ascents