In reply to JamieSparkes:
I went to check the location out today and it's clear that the quarry that's been used for drytooling is
not within the area for which planning applications have been submitted. If you look at the map in the link I posted on 10th October, the drytooling quarry is the u-shaped grey area to the east of the orange boundary line for the development site, and therefore outside the site.
Access to the top of the drytooling quarry is not difficult, although it is a slightly longer way round than ploughing straight in to the quarry from the park. Follow the main, wide path round to the left, then after 100 yards or so take a sharp turn to the right, almost going back on yourself, to pick up a rising track. Follow that up on to the upper part of the site and you'll soon see signs warning of the cliff edge. That's the top of the drytooling quarry.
I didn't see any obvious signs of anyone having drytooled there recently, The arete and corner at the left hand end of the main face which, from the information still floating around online, appears to have been where most of the climbing went on in the past, looked as if any cleaning that might have been done was in the process of being overtaken by nature again.
The area that folks seem to want to develop is just over the wall from Ravelston Dykes Road, adjacent to number 7 Ravelston Dykes Road. There's a metal fence and gate in the wall just next to number seven's property boundary. There were tyre tracks from some kind of machine leading to and from the gate, and it looked like a few exploratory holes had been dug and then filled in again. The area in question does contains the pond, which seems to be just the bottom of the quarry that's filled with water. Looking at old maps, it looks like the pond used to occupy a lot more of the area. I can't help thinking that the ground conditions might not be great for building. Perhaps that's what the holes were dug to find out.
The whole area is currently fenced off from the Ravelston Woods LNR by a four-strand wire fence - not exactly difficult to step over over or slip through if you feel like exercising your right to responsible access. There is one cleanish face in that quarry but it's not particularly high, and the area at the bottom is fairly choked with vegetation (including Japanese Knotweed, which I think anyone developing the site would have to deal with, in addition to the questionable water table).
So, bottom line: the Ravelston Quarry previously used for drytooling isn't within the area under threat of development. A number of planning applications for that site have been turned down, and the latest one also seems to have been recommended for refusal as being contrary to the Local Development Plan in that the proposed development would have a detrimental impact on the landscape quality and open character of the Green Belt, a Special Landscape Area and an area of Open Space. Even if planning permission is granted for that soggy old hole, it doesn't seem to be an obvious threat to the recreation of anyone wanting to drytool in the other quarry.
Post edited at 00:32