No doubt a bit of a daft question.
Just retired my faithful Garmin 220 as the battery life on GPS is now about 2 hours and replaced in with a 245, mainly for the battery life when doing long days walks.
Obviously its a huge leap in terms of stuff loaded on there, but I'm quite keen on looking at using the HRM to do a bit more structured training in terms of tempo runs etc.
I'm aware that wrist HRMs aren't particularly accurate, (but its pretty much spot on at resting heart rate), and the pre-loaded zones are based on some 220 - age metric, but there seems to be a big difference between measured heart rate and my perceived effort.
On my first run with it tonight my usual hill climbs, which feel reasonably hard but I can keep jogging on up, it was showing I was in the 90 to 100% 'Max' region. I'd have expected to be breathing much heavier and feeling sick at that level of exertion. Similarly running a 9 mile route a good 30 secs per mile slower than my normal pace falls into the top end of 'tempo', but feels steady enough to hold a conversation.
Am I much less fit than I thought and my heart is about to explode, do I need to let the various metrics (apparently it has a go at estimating VO2 max after a week of data) do their stuff or does it need some manual tweaking?
Any thoughts?