In reply to JR:
I think you are being way too kind to the so called BMC 30. Those interested in real debate don't organise secret campaigns based on clear misinformation (something that has never stopped either, unless my sources in some clubs are making things up... I wish someone could leak these newer letters to a public forum as happened for the dishonest letters on the MoNC).
The NW area meeting debate and Crag's pages to me represents the fairer end of the alternative view in real public debate. It might be wise to link that page and the BMC discussions on the key news threads (hard to find from a broken search facility).