Skip over navigation

*This topic has been archived, and won't accept reply postings.*

*This topic has been archived, and won't accept reply postings.*
### Elsewhere on the site

## / Mathematical question - can you map every x to every y? |

ablackett - * * on 12 Jun 2017

A year 10 student asked me a question today,"can you have a function that maps every x value to every y value?". When I dug into what he was asking, he wanted to plot a graph which shaded in the entire (x,y) plane.

A few seconds thought and I explained that it wasn't a function, but a relationship as it was one to many. I hazarded a guess that you could notate such a relationship as

f(x): R-->R

Where R is the real numbers.

I'm not happy with that as I'm not convinced it does what he is asking, and i'm not convinced my notation is right.

1) Is there a way to notate what he is asking?

2) Is there anything interesting about his question that I can inspire him with? Is this type of thing used anywhere for anything?

As an aside, the same kid had a fantastic question last lesson about what happens to the shape of the graph x^n + y^n = 1 as n->infinity. Unbelievably he answered this question intuitively (for even n), without even reaching for his pencil!

A few seconds thought and I explained that it wasn't a function, but a relationship as it was one to many. I hazarded a guess that you could notate such a relationship as

f(x): R-->R

Where R is the real numbers.

I'm not happy with that as I'm not convinced it does what he is asking, and i'm not convinced my notation is right.

1) Is there a way to notate what he is asking?

2) Is there anything interesting about his question that I can inspire him with? Is this type of thing used anywhere for anything?

As an aside, the same kid had a fantastic question last lesson about what happens to the shape of the graph x^n + y^n = 1 as n->infinity. Unbelievably he answered this question intuitively (for even n), without even reaching for his pencil!

2

elsewhere on 12 Jun 2017

In reply to ablackett:

y=f(x) is a one dimensional line so it doesn't "colour in" the full two dimensional x-y plane.

I think you need a 3 dimensional function that defines a 2 dimensional surface like x^2+y^2+z^2=1 defines the surface of a sphere.

PS smart kid!

y=f(x) is a one dimensional line so it doesn't "colour in" the full two dimensional x-y plane.

I think you need a 3 dimensional function that defines a 2 dimensional surface like x^2+y^2+z^2=1 defines the surface of a sphere.

PS smart kid!

Post edited at 16:09

6

felt - * * on 12 Jun 2017

GrahamD - * * on 12 Jun 2017

Robert Durran - * * on 12 Jun 2017

In reply to ablackett:

Yes - a whole fascinating universe. Try googling "space filling curves"

That's a lovely question. The odd case is fun too.

> Is there anything interesting about his question that I can inspire him with?

Yes - a whole fascinating universe. Try googling "space filling curves"

> As an aside, the same kid had a fantastic question last lesson about what happens to the shape of the graph x^n + y^n = 1 as n->infinity. Unbelievably he answered this question intuitively (for even n), without even reaching for his pencil!

That's a lovely question. The odd case is fun too.

4

Robert Durran - * * on 12 Jun 2017

In reply to GrahamD:

I think you must mean as w tends to infinity, not zero.

And I'm not convinced it does a good job! Maybe......

> something like y=tan (wx) as w goes to zero would probably do a good job ?

I think you must mean as w tends to infinity, not zero.

And I'm not convinced it does a good job! Maybe......

Post edited at 17:17

Steve Clark - * * on 12 Jun 2017

In reply to ablackett:

In Cartesian coordinates :

z=0

Edit : you could introduce dot & cross product / planar notation as a new concept.

In Cartesian coordinates :

z=0

Edit : you could introduce dot & cross product / planar notation as a new concept.

Post edited at 17:36

1

Ramblin dave - * * on 12 Jun 2017

In reply to ablackett:

So, there isn't a single-valued function R -> R as defined, because single valued means it can only take one value at one point.

Space-filling curves are neat, but they map [0, 1] to [0, 1]^2, or otherwise a line to a space.

Another example that's close to what's being asked for are functions that take every value on every interval:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conway_base_13_function

That is to say, on every open interval (a, b), no matter how small, it takes every value in R. The construction of this from scratch was the "something to occupy the ones who are too clever for their own good" question on an undergrad example sheet that I did. I didn't get anywhere near it!

So, there isn't a single-valued function R -> R as defined, because single valued means it can only take one value at one point.

Space-filling curves are neat, but they map [0, 1] to [0, 1]^2, or otherwise a line to a space.

Another example that's close to what's being asked for are functions that take every value on every interval:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conway_base_13_function

That is to say, on every open interval (a, b), no matter how small, it takes every value in R. The construction of this from scratch was the "something to occupy the ones who are too clever for their own good" question on an undergrad example sheet that I did. I didn't get anywhere near it!

1

Red Rover - * * on 12 Jun 2017

In reply to ablackett: What about x+y=x+y? Would that colour the graph in?

DancingOnRock - * * on 12 Jun 2017

Robert Durran - * * on 12 Jun 2017

In reply to Steve Clark:

But that is really just the name of the x/y plane and says nothing about any mapping or function.

> In Cartesian coordinates :

> z=0

But that is really just the name of the x/y plane and says nothing about any mapping or function.

drysori - * * on 12 Jun 2017

In reply to Robert Durran:

Given that what OP is looking for is a mathematical statement that says "x and y have no relationship" then I suspect that's the only way.

> But that is really just the name of the x/y plane and says nothing about any mapping or function.

Given that what OP is looking for is a mathematical statement that says "x and y have no relationship" then I suspect that's the only way.

Robert Durran - * * on 12 Jun 2017

In reply to drysori:

Or, rather, there isn't a way!

> Given that what OP is looking for is a mathematical statement that says "x and y have no relationship" then I suspect that's the only way.

Or, rather, there isn't a way!

Steve Clark - * * on 12 Jun 2017

In reply to Robert Durran:

I'm an engineer, not a pure maths guy.

If he wants to plot a graph that's filled-in, he's drawing a plane ( r dot n = c). It's a loci type thing. r=[x,y,z], n=[0,0,1], c=0

If you want strictly define a mapping, I guess there's some set terminology that just describes it, but useless for anything real world. Not a clue I'm afraid.

I'm an engineer, not a pure maths guy.

If he wants to plot a graph that's filled-in, he's drawing a plane ( r dot n = c). It's a loci type thing. r=[x,y,z], n=[0,0,1], c=0

If you want strictly define a mapping, I guess there's some set terminology that just describes it, but useless for anything real world. Not a clue I'm afraid.

GrahamD - * * on 12 Jun 2017

In reply to Robert Durran:

Infinity, sorry.

> I think you must mean as w tends to infinity, not zero.

> And I'm not convinced it does a good job! Maybe......

Infinity, sorry.

Ramblin dave - * * on 12 Jun 2017

In reply to Robert Durran:

Well, kind of.

If he's after a function f(x) such that the graph y = f(x) fills the whole plane then there isn't. The closest you'll get is taking every value on every interval, as above.

If he's after a function f(x, y) such that the set of solutions to f(x, y) = 0 fills the whole plane then f: (x, y) -> 0 does just fine.

> Or, rather, there isn't a way!

Well, kind of.

If he's after a function f(x) such that the graph y = f(x) fills the whole plane then there isn't. The closest you'll get is taking every value on every interval, as above.

If he's after a function f(x, y) such that the set of solutions to f(x, y) = 0 fills the whole plane then f: (x, y) -> 0 does just fine.

syv_k - * * on 12 Jun 2017

In reply to drysori:

All the graph formulae and definitions are constraining what points are valid. Therefore I would say that the empty statement "" would define the entire plane. Tautologies such as x+y=x+y reduce down to be the same thing.

All the graph formulae and definitions are constraining what points are valid. Therefore I would say that the empty statement "" would define the entire plane. Tautologies such as x+y=x+y reduce down to be the same thing.

2

ablackett - * * on 12 Jun 2017

Thank you all, I was hoping to get something interesting out of this and the Space Filling Curves that Robert pointed at are brilliant. We have looked at fractals a bit and how finite lines can have infinite length, and how finite objects can have infinite surface areas so the Peano Curve will be interesting for him to look at.

The Conway base 13 function is a bit trickier for me to get my head around.

Trying to understand the conway base 13 function, if I take the interval (1, 2) and try and find the value in this interval which maps to -8.3 - just picking any old number out of my ass.

If I take the numbe 1.B8C3 (base 13), which is in the interval (1,2)

f(B8C3)=-8.3

Is that about right?

I found this tool helpful here, to convert fractional numbers in base 13 to base 10, http://wims.unice.fr/wims/wims.cgi

The Conway base 13 function is a bit trickier for me to get my head around.

Trying to understand the conway base 13 function, if I take the interval (1, 2) and try and find the value in this interval which maps to -8.3 - just picking any old number out of my ass.

If I take the numbe 1.B8C3 (base 13), which is in the interval (1,2)

f(B8C3)=-8.3

Is that about right?

I found this tool helpful here, to convert fractional numbers in base 13 to base 10, http://wims.unice.fr/wims/wims.cgi

ablackett - * * on 12 Jun 2017

In reply to syv_k:

This might be true, but I don't think it's going to inspire him if I tell him the answer to his question is " ".

> All the graph formulae and definitions are constraining what points are valid. Therefore I would say that the empty statement "" would define the entire plane. Tautologies such as x+y=x+y reduce down to be the same thing.

This might be true, but I don't think it's going to inspire him if I tell him the answer to his question is " ".

2

syv_k - * * on 12 Jun 2017

In reply to ablackett:

I would have liked that answer a lot as a kid, but I am odd! (And ended up doing a lot of maths)

I would have liked that answer a lot as a kid, but I am odd! (And ended up doing a lot of maths)

Ramblin dave - * * on 13 Jun 2017

In reply to ablackett:

Yes, spot on!

> The Conway base 13 function is a bit trickier for me to get my head around.

> Trying to understand the conway base 13 function, if I take the interval (1, 2) and try and find the value in this interval which maps to -8.3 - just picking any old number out of my ass.

> If I take the numbe 1.B8C3 (base 13), which is in the interval (1,2)

> f(B8C3)=-8.3

> Is that about right?

Yes, spot on!

ablackett - * * on 13 Jun 2017

Robert Durran - * * on 13 Jun 2017

In reply to ablackett:

Typical Conway........ One wonders how he came up with it!

> Cheers. What an obscure bit of maths.

Typical Conway........ One wonders how he came up with it!

ablackett - * * on 13 Jun 2017

In reply to syv_k:

Spot on, your answer did make him smile.

> I would have liked that answer a lot as a kid, but I am odd! (And ended up doing a lot of maths)

Spot on, your answer did make him smile.

21 Jul 2017

An independent organisational review of the BMC is well underway and the next step the Review Team is taking is to perform a... Read more

170721

0

10 Jul 2017

The Lake District has become a UNESCO World Heritage Site, joining just over 1000 other locations worldwide, including Machu... Read more

170710

0

20 Jul 2017

Ultraviolet (UV) light and dirt are the two most important sources of damage for tents. UV light attacks the fabric, reducing its... Read more

170720

0

29 Nov 2016

No Map Could Show Them. The pioneering Victorian women in mountaineering of the early twentieth Century. The women whose... Read more

161129

0