In reply to davidoldfart:
Personally, I think climate change, and the public understanding of it, is such an important subject is should be discussed on any forum. However, I appreciate that I've got totally off topic. In which case, I'll make this my last post. I suggest you PM me if you feel the need to reply to any of the below.
> Pachauri uses the same word that I have in my articles: this is a "pause".
You also used the word "Stopped". In fact the title of article was "Global warming 'stopped' 16 years ago". A stop and a pause do not mean the same thing. Pause implies a process will continue at some point in the future, while a stop implies that it will not. As you have used both in your article, it's not clear to me which you mean. Do you think global warming has stopped forever or paused and will continue at some point in the future?
> It is also one of unexpected, and as yet unexplained, length
I find this comment particularly frustrating as you obviously haven't read or have chosen to ignore my quote from the Met Office spokesperson. To re-iterate it is not unexpected in the context of previous periods in which global temperatures rose very slowly or fell. To quote the spokesperson again "The current period of reduced warming is not unprecedented and 15 year long periods [of small rises in temperature] are not unusual."
> This all has a big impact on forecasts for the climate sensitivity - how much the world will warm if CO2 doubles, as many scientists who could in no way be described as sceptics, let alone "deniers", have been saying.
I can't make sense of this sentence.