At the recent BMC SW area meeting, the issue of the unneccessary removal of loose rock was raised. The suggestion was made that people were taking crowbars to remove rattle chockstones or prise off slightly loose flakes that were fine to pull down on. The thought was that people who had previously only climbed indoors were trying to sanitise the crags to make them "safe". Some examples in the south west were given. I was wondering just how widespread this is and what peoples thoughts on this are.
Personally, climbing as much as I do on the Culm, I feel that some loose rock is part of the character of the climb and something we need to learn to deal with. If all the loose were removed from Wreckers' Slab (VS 4b) there'd be nothing left!
What gets me is (sport) climbers complaining about holds being 'dusty'. Especially when its in some old quarry. These must surely be people who have only ever climbed indoors and maybe just somewhere like Kalimnos?
> What gets me is (sport) climbers complaining about holds being 'dusty'.
Who has complained about this? Some spots are just more dusty than others, so you might say "don't think I'll go back there as everything was covered in dust/sand/moss/etc." but I don't think I've heard people complaining for example here on UKC or on FB climbing groups...
Logbook entries.
> What gets me is (sport) climbers complaining about holds being 'dusty'. Especially when its in some old quarry. These must surely be people who have only ever climbed indoors and maybe just somewhere like Kalimnos?
What a load of unsubstantiated toss. And it's spelt "Kalymnos".
> The suggestion was made that people were taking crowbars to remove rattle chockstones or prise off slightly loose flakes that were fine to pull down on. The thought was that people who had previously only climbed indoors were trying to sanitise the crags to make them "safe". Some examples in the south west were given.
To be clear, when you say "the suggestion" and "the thought", are we talking about actual evidence - like, has someone encountered several different groups of people engaged in this sort of overenthusiastic cleaning and talked to them about what they're doing and why and found that they were all indoor climbers who thought the crags needed to be made safe - or is it literally just suggestions and thoughts?
> To be clear, when you say "the suggestion" and "the thought", are we talking about actual evidence - like, has someone encountered several different groups of people engaged in this sort of overenthusiastic cleaning and talked to them about what they're doing and why and found that they were all indoor climbers who thought the crags needed to be made safe - or is it literally just suggestions and thoughts?
My thoughts are that if they're all indoor climbers then they're unlikely to be outside.
> My thoughts are that if they're all indoor climbers then they're unlikely to be outside.
I was thinking that most of the namby-pamby latte-sipping indoor climbers I know seem unlikely to own anything as rugged and practical as a crowbar...
I agree, dealing with loose rock, dodgy holds, dust, lichen etc is all part of the experience and character of climbing, and has been since Haskett Smith's days. It's something climbers need to learn to cope with through experience, so safe removal of loose debris seems fine, but actually prising off potentially "unsafe" flakes and the like is more of a grey area, and in many cases unnecessary. In the 1960s coping with the rocking chockstone in the crack of Lower Scout Crag Slab (Severe) was part of the character of the climb which we all learnt to deal with over the years. I was last there about 5 years ago and it had gone. I don't when that happened or whether it came away naturally or was it "helped"?
The discussion regarding the sanitising of climbing can be extended to the installation of fixed ropes or artificial steps on descent routes - not really necessary, when it's perfectly possible o down climb or ab. The descent route from Idwal Slabs is a prime example. It is just not necessary to interfere with the existing natural descent, and if you have been able to lead the climbs on the Slabs, then you should be perfectly capable of down climbing or abbing this. If not you might question whether you should be there in the first place, rather than try to sanitise the moves.
How would these poor souls manage in the Alps? 🤣🤣
> How would these poor souls manage in the Alps? 🤣🤣
They'd be absolutely fine; plenty of indoor climbing available......
https://www.chamonix.net/english/mountaineering/rock-climbing/wall-climbing
Simple... we just need to get a wide arm-bar width-ed offwidth featuring a rotating chockstone added to every climbing wall. Maybe one of the climbing wall bogs can be specially plumbed so the cistern overflows a little and drips down the back of offwidth. This all should be added as an update to the middle section of the official Olympic speedwall if you ask me. Then nobody will bat an eyelid if they stray outdoors.
> The thought was that people who had previously only climbed indoors were trying to sanitise the crags to make them "safe". Some examples in the south west were given. I was wondering just how widespread this is and what peoples thoughts on this are.
Far more likely to be members of the outdoor industry worried about clients getting injured, and the insurance and reputational consequences. Indoor climbers are usually underequipped for outdoor stuff, never mind taking crowbars and lump hammers.
Learning to deal with loose rock, dust, damp, protection that's less than ideal, exposure and much else should be part of every outdoor climber's apprenticeship. For that reason, I'm against making crags as stable as climbing walls.
You have to learn to manage risk. The biggest change needed is in your own head.
T.
I tend to use a claw hammer and wire brush when cleaning a new route. Originally I'd take a small crowbar too but it was only really useful for the odd spot where you couldn't get the claw of the hammer in because of the angle; the hammer alone had plenty enough leverage. Personally I tend to prise most things off because a) just because I pull down on it doesn't mean someone else won't pull out on it b) freeze-thaw cycles mean that if it's loose or has hairline cracks all around, then it could easily become dangerous 5 or 10 years down the line when the route gets a second ascent c) I've had first-hand experiences of pulling and snapping things off many times and I don't like it very much d) When the block is large (say 20kg to 2000kg), if it were to ever come off, it'd be likely to seriously injure or kill someone and I'd rather not have that on my conscience (someone told me a year or so back that they'd pulled a big block off one of my routes and got hurt and I felt guilty about that).
I know another new-router in N Scotland who similarly cleans new routes using a crowbar.
So I don't think that cleaning things this way is particularly uncommon for new routes.
When it comes to established routes, I think it's relatively rare that I do much cleaning and I can't remember taking a crowbar to one. Clearly there are times though when weathering results in serious objective danger which local people will deal with.
It sounds like the people at your BMC meeting are taking the process a bit too far though tbh. I'd say that a crowbar or other leverage device has its place but that breaking something off that is perfectly safe and been there for a long time through many repeats isn't something that should be being done. But that rather makes it come down to a judgement decision and ofc everyone has their own different judgement...
So I present to you neither solutions nor clear agreement with one side of the debate over the other
> Personally, climbing as much as I do on the Culm, I feel that some loose rock is part of the character of the climb and something we need to learn to deal with. If all the loose were removed from Wreckers' Slab (VS 4b) there'd be nothing left!
Wreckers' Slab is a bit of a special case and one might hope anyone climbing it understands that.
I've lobbed loose rocks off routes in Swanage to lessen the chances of another climber inadvertently dropping a kilo of limestone on their belayer's head. Rock just lying there, no crowbar required. AFAIK from conversations with locals, to do so within reason on otherwise sound routes is standard operating practice. Obviously, you need to be sure there isn't anyone in the firing line. I don't think to do so is "sanitising", I think it's a bit of consideration to other climbers.
To be fair, it's spelled Κάλυμνος.
> Logbook entries.
More a comment than a complaint? I might put in the logbook that a route is a bit rubbish - from one I climbed last week: "Led onsight as far as the last bolt, but lots is dangerously loose and I couldn't work out at all how to get to the chains at 6a." That's not a complaint, it's just a statement of fact.
I'd love to see someone 'sanitising' Charnwood Quarry.
They'd get down to Magma.
> To be clear, when you say "the suggestion" and "the thought", are we talking about actual evidence
To be clear, one of the participants in last Monday's BMC SW area meeting (which I was chairing) raised this as a concern in AOB. He has seen evidence of what he considers overenthusiastic / unnecessary cleaning on routes in the Wye Valley and Avon Gorge. The suggestion, that it was indoor climbers moving outdoors responsible for this, is speculation. The question is, is this more widespread nationally and if so what (if anything) should be done to discourage such activity?
The idea that it's climbers fresh from the indoors who are getting out there (presumably) abbing down routes with their crowbars to clean them seems pretty far fetched to me.
Are we talking about existing or new routes, do you know?
In my opinion it's far more likely to be the older gent / recent retiree crowd who also seem to be heavily involved in bolting low grade, low quality sport routes.
Is this thread for ill informed speculation about unknown climbers doing undefined actions on unspecified routes? If so, I totally reckon that….
That's certainly a group who'd be more familiar with the practicalities of cleaning routes, given that in the areas in question there's probably a degree of excavation required to get to the finished product...
It is existing routes not new ones.
> That's not a complaint, it's just a statement of fact.
Ok so maybe not a complaint but certainly not a fact, its your opinion. Someone else may think it is not dangerously loose and easy for 6a. But yes I know what you are getting at.
But once you start to view routes as products, and think they should be safe products, any suspicious blocks become a issue to be solved.
Not just on the tottering choss pile destined to become a popular low grade sport venue but on all crags.
I can't see the newbe indoor outdoor climber abseiling down a cliff with a crowbar. Rather someone (with lots of time) who has honed their crowbar skills bolting quarried limestone and become fired up in a misguided belief that they are contributing to society.
There have been posts on here before along the lines of "can someone tell MRT that there's a loose block at the top of X Lake District crag". It's hard to draw clear guidelines, but some of these did strike me as overzealous. Nothing to suggest, though, that indoor climbers were the ones requesting this, although definitely a little naive in some cases.
That explains why I once observed a guide and his two clients trying to remove a very well keyed in flake from a crack at the top of Bicycle Repair Man (E1 5b) (or there abouts, memory is hazy) for the best part of an hour before finally giving up.. but not without having dislodged a load of mud and dust down on the route below.
> 5 or 10 years down the line when the route gets a second ascent >
I see you're an optimist
Crowbars are rubbish for prising off loose rock. An ice axe is much better; lighter and more leverage. Amateurs!
> But once you start to view routes as products, and think they should be safe products, any suspicious blocks become a issue to be solved.
Agree.
> I can't see the newbe indoor outdoor climber abseiling down a cliff with a crowbar.
Also agree.
> Rather someone (with lots of time) who has honed their crowbar skills bolting quarried limestone and become fired up in a misguided belief that they are contributing to society.
But surely if the end result is 'a popular low grade sport venue', they are contributing to society (albeit perhaps not in a way which you would endorse)?
Oddly enough have spent this morning writing about routes as products (have mixed emotions about this) and this afternoon strenuously wielding a crowbar (sorry, Jonathan) on an aforesaid 'product'.
Clearly guilty as sin!
Mick
> I see you're an optimist
I am! There are obviously routes that _will_ probably never be repeated and most certainly _should_ never be repeated! (discordant cacophony comes to mind). But for a couple of the ones I've put up on better-known crags, I keep hoping to see someone doing them and leaving a comment on UKClogbooks. It kills me when someone logs one and gives absolutely no comment or grade feedback at all
> But once you start to view routes as products, and think they should be safe products, any suspicious blocks become a issue to be solved.
> Not just on the tottering choss pile destined to become a popular low grade sport venue but on all crags.
Pure speculation - I imagine that the people bolting new routes are well aware of the difference between a limestone quarry and wreckers slab, and that different rules apply.
'How would these poor souls manage in the Alps? 🤣🤣' They're not in the alps so it doesn't matter. You may as well go to Ceuse, and complain about the lack of ice climbing
This whole thread is trolling
> This whole thread is trolling
I certainly am not trolling. This is a serious question raised at a BMC area meeting. Are established routes (not new routes) being being over enthusiastically cleaned / improved / made safe. If so where is this happening (apart from the SW) who's doing the "improvement" what do climbers as a whole think of this and wha, if anything should we do about it?
I have come across a group of respected climbers using a caterpillar tracked excavator to "descale" a lovely limestone slab with established routes in a quarry near me(so still in the SW). They said it was OK as they'd checked with the owner. They then bolted some indoor holds on to the slab to "make it climbable" for their clients. Does the BMC have a rule about this sort of thing?
The BMC does not have “rules” as such, we try to have agreements as to what is acceptable, and try to convince the bunch of anarchists that are climbers to stick to the agreements.
Is your example of the digger and bolt on holds for real? That is well beyond what most people would consider acceptable!
Name and shame, please. If ‘respected climbers’ are doing this they need to be unrespected as soon as possible. Assuming your post was serious, that is.
jcm
> Is this thread for ill informed speculation about unknown climbers doing undefined actions on unspecified routes? If so, I totally reckon that….
It's vague news par excellence
> I certainly am not trolling. This is a serious question raised at a BMC area meeting. Are established routes (not new routes) being being over enthusiastically cleaned / improved / made safe. If so where is this happening (apart from the SW) who's doing the "improvement" what do climbers as a whole think of this and wha, if anything should we do about it?
I don't think he means your the troll, but rather you have been trolled into posting about this.
> Is your example of the digger and bolt on holds for real?
Although a side conversation to the main thread, yes this has happened, and it wasn't the first time the organisation has done something like this.
I’ve always considered climbing as a pointlessly dangerous pastime.
There does seem to be a proliferation of the idea that it should be made safe (and convenient) such as the growing number of fixed anchors and abseil points where they are not needed.
It's real and as Mr Claw pointed out the climbers and organisation have form. As Mark says it is very difficult to get climbers to follow "agreements". Very few have anything to do with the BMC apart from insurance.
Old limestone quarries are not Stanage and not every pebble needs to be venerated. For most of us it's just another bit of industrial wasteland.
Mick, I hear great things about your ‘popular low grade sport product’, and am going to make the effort to sample said product this summer.
"Low grade" or "low graded"? I've done both
Paul, I honestly wouldn't rush! Come down for Pete Oxley's routes, not mine. He did some real stunners. I'm just rummaging amid the muck, looking for the proverbial brass.
Having said that, to be somewhere like Wallsend on a sunny evening, with the sea crashing in below, a mile of crag... it feels special.
Mick
Low grade or low graded? Yes!
Well if noone else wants to use 'popular low grade sport product' as a route name, I'm having it
Actually, that is a really good name
> What a load of unsubstantiated toss. And it's spelt "Kalymnos".
Yup, strong “old man shouts at cloud” energy about this
As an old man what exactly does this mean?
> The suggestion, that it was indoor climbers moving outdoors responsible for this, is speculation.
When I first started climbing outside, I pulled on anything and everything without giving it a second thought. They were the 'grips' on the routes, and they were getting used. It's only after you have pulled a few things off and taken the wangers that you start to think about loose rock. It's more likely to be people with experience 'cleaning' the routes.
> Yup, strong “old man shouts at cloud” energy about this
Or maybe some strong "lets dig up some potatoes and pretend we are farmers" energy?
I had an 8m ground fall a few years back due to a hold coming off.
Six spinal fractures, four weeks in hospital, a further eight in a body brace.
I don't believe that climbing should be sanitised in any way. The OP is correct: we just need to learn to cope with these natural hazards.
I spent two years on Culm in the mid 80's, have climbed in the Alps and still dabble at winter mixed so have 'done my time' in this regard.
Meh. People have been doing it for years. Its just getting worse. Did you know that some real wimps have been slapping bolts in perfectly good rock? Just as reprehensible to me. If you can't cope with whats there go away maybe?
> Is this thread for ill informed speculation about unknown climbers doing undefined actions on unspecified routes? If so, I totally reckon that….
I totally reckon you're right.
Removal of rock covers a wide spectrum, from trundling a loose block that could easily kill someone at a busy venue, to prising off a slightly rattly hold unnecessarily.
In the former case, try telling the parent of someone who's in a coma because someone else pulled a block off "Yeah we knew that was loose, but we felt it was important not to 'sanitise' the crag."
There is also a difference between crags that are intrinsically and obviously adventurous and those where loose rock is not expected (which is why you see threads announcing loose blocks at Stanage but not, funnily enough, at Craig Dorys).
Without knowing the specific cases that are being referred to, this thread is just an invitation to indulge prejudices.
But to answer the OPs question, it's not something I've heard many complaints about. There was some hooha about a piece of gear being revealed by a small flake removal on Primal Scream, but that was years ago.
Didn't the rocky block, that had always been there, on Moyer's Buttress, get toppled by someone who thought it needed to go?
It did. And it almost certainly didn't. (Need to go, that is.)
> I spent two years on Culm in the mid 80's,
Did you get stuck for so long because of the loose rock?
Yes, got to put my hand up for this one, I had a client who particularly wanted to do a slab climb (as he'd seen a photo of the devils slide), so it was the only way really
The premise of this thread is bonkers. Many crags are relatively solid and known for this, eg Tremadog where it has been acceptable to remove the odd block that has become unstable. Other crags such as Culm coast or even Cloggy West Buttess are known for loose holds. Any attempt to “sanitise” these crags by removing the loose holds will be ineffective and pointless because there will simply be more loose holds underneath.
> Any attempt to “sanitise” these crags by removing the loose holds will be ineffective and pointless because there will simply be more loose holds underneath.
I think that's not the case for all rock types. My experience of developing routes on coastal dolerite for example is that often, the loose stuff comes off copiously and very easily, but what's left is bomber. Of course there's still the possibility that removing a creaky bit will leave a route unprotected or unclimbable...
Yep fair enough.
Though I imagine a lot of people don't realise sometimes just how much loose stuff was initially removed from now established classics. In cases where the FA was less thorough in their cleaning, the remaining looseness could become accepted as part of the 'character' of a route, where if it was all removed to begin with no one would be any the wiser.
I'm speaking speculatively here, again without knowing the routes that gave rise to the debate.
> Did you get stuck for so long because of the loose rock?
Nah, climbing fast was the only way to get up. Any hesitation in a hold was out of the question. Often the holds were very good, but you had to put them back in place after you'd used them for your second to use
> Yep fair enough.
> Though I imagine a lot of people don't realise sometimes just how much loose stuff was initially removed from now established classics. In cases where the FA was less thorough in their cleaning, the remaining looseness could become accepted as part of the 'character' of a route, where if it was all removed to begin with no one would be any the wiser.
> I'm speaking speculatively here, again without knowing the routes that gave rise to the debate.
Spot on!
Thanks for bringing this into this forum, Mark, after my concerns expressed in the meeting. I should clarify as you have tried to do that I was concerned about established climbs in particular those in which the featured "loose rock" was mentioned in the guidebook description or the sanitising was changing the character of the climb.
About the best example I can give would be the top pitch of one star route Central Rib VS at Wintours Leap where the final pitch used to have "Some small flakes at half height rattle but currently seem to be wedging each other in place." I've climbed the route many times over the past ten years or so and had no reason to doubt that judgement but they are there no more. Instead there is a deep wide dirty scar with signs of how the flakes were prised out indicating that it took some effort.
On the same crag, Moth HS used to have a similar wobbly block that you wouldn't want to yard on although it made a good foothold. That's gone too.
I climbed yesterday at Portishead Quarry and Pickpocket HVS has had a good small wire placement chiselled into the crack where there was no chance of anything but a marginal alien nearby before. I guess it's debateable now whether the climb deserves HVS. There was also evidence on that visit of hold chipping to improve on friction footholds on the Brink of Solarity. While I was climbing there seemed to be someone preparing to abseil and top-rope from above, but they cleared off when I shouted to them that I was climbing the route.
I have photos of much of this damage recorded but don't want to clog up this thread.
I speculated at the BMC meeting that this might be Wall climbers since I'd first noticed the increase in this tendency after lockdown was eased but before the Walls were opened, but it is pure speculation.
I know this isn't new: Rockfax reports on Kellys Crack, Crow Chin; "The well-protected cleft has tricky moves at mid-height. The loose chockstone was removed by someone around 2012 having survived 100 years of being heaved on." However, it seems to be an increasing tendency to excavate, chip and trundle to make a climb conform to someone's ideas of safety or convenience that may have been nurtured on climbing walls rather than trad climbing.
Thanks to Mark for bringing this up and to all who have responded. Perhaps we need some BMC guidelines on "crag-cleaning" that will protect the character of trad climbs with less than perfect rock.
> Is this thread for ill informed speculation about unknown climbers doing undefined actions on unspecified routes? If so, I totally reckon that….
Isn't that the whole of UKC in a nutshell??
> About the best example I can give would be the top pitch of one star route Central Rib VS at Wintours Leap where the final pitch used to have "Some small flakes at half height rattle but currently seem to be wedging each other in place." I've climbed the route many times over the past ten years or so and had no reason to doubt that judgement but they are there no more. Instead there is a deep wide dirty scar with signs of how the flakes were prised out indicating that it took some effort.
Must have used that hold a hundred times. You could even move it to lock a perfect finger jam in place. It was centuries away from dissolving its own way out.
That level of public spirited cleaning is no more than someone wanting to leave their mark.
I don't know how on earth these people think it's ok to take it upon themselves to decide, in their that something is loose and dangerous, and that they ought to take it upon themselves to crowbar it out without discussion or conversation with the local climbing community.
I just can't think where they got that idea from https://www.ukclimbing.com/articles/skills/removing_loose_rock_at_horseshoe...
S.I.D.S wall used to have a green mossy streak as I recall, and the rest was painted in gloss grey. No offwidth and rotating chockstones though
I've crowbarred off a lot of rock in my time, but all of it "scaling" loose rock in landfill quarries or above roads/houses and not on climbing crags. My non climbing crag experience is that it's not that uncommon for a loose small block to hold up an otherwise stable bigger block/blocks above. Like in article you linked. We'd often rig ropes to pendulum us while working so it'd swing us away and out of danger (and make sure rope in bags not hanging down so couldn't be caught or damaged by falling blocks). Then tickle it at arms length with a long bar. I don't think most recreational climbers have the experience to do this safely
>
> On the same crag, Moth HS used to have a similar wobbly block that you wouldn't want to yard on although it made a good foothold. That's gone too.
Hi Dave
I don't know anything about the other examples, but I believe this block came off with somebody holding onto it (or standing on it) last year (there's a comment to this effect in the logbooks) - I don't think it was an example of intentional "cleaning".
Rick
It went in 2017 I think.
Top roping London Wall ?
Remove loose rock from Cornakey and you'll probably be at the A39 before you find anything bomber
> And this process if sanitisation often strips away the character of a place. A perfect example of this is Pexhill Quarry, which has been turned into something akin to an outdoor climbing wall.
Although I don't doubt you, I'm surprised. I used to climb regularly at Pex. Although I'm now at the other side of the country, I keep an interest in it via the Facebook group. I know some of the leading protagonists and were under the impression that they were doing a great job.
Mick
Sanitisation of climbing follows a broadly cultural trends of inclusivity and inevitable commoditisation driving the desire for consumption. People talk of getting and having got climbs. Ken Wilson knew when he described abseil bolting as a ‘cynical’ and ‘soulless rape’ of the rock. The cult of individualism is highlighted by the job of the belayer or ‘rope holder’ and the applause from the nodding heads below when the deal is done, the route is got and performance ends in a blubbering encore.
I've trundled a fair few blocks in my time; the majority would have killed or severely maimed one or more climbers. A few of these have been specifically mentioned within the first ascent descriptions, which makes it particularly perplexing. In these instances, the first ascentionist was clearly aware of the loose block, but was happy to leave them in situ.
> Sanitisation of climbing follows a broadly cultural trends of inclusivity and inevitable commoditisation driving the desire for consumption. People talk of getting and having got climbs. Ken Wilson knew when he described abseil bolting as a ‘cynical’ and ‘soulless rape’ of the rock. The cult of individualism is highlighted by the job of the belayer or ‘rope holder’ and the applause from the nodding heads below when the deal is done, the route is got and performance ends in a blubbering encore.
Yeah, whatever, something like that multi syllable waffle. Innit.
My rule was, if you had to make more than 5 seconds effort to shift a piece of loose rock, leave it be.
I was there last week; it’s nonsense. The main problem I can see is the significant growth of oak which now covers a lot of the quarry floor.
I think his reference may be to the placing of bolts for belays at regular intervals around the top from Lady Jane to Cobweb Crack area. Personally, I don’t like their presence, but I can see the difficulty with continuing to use the Water Board’s ageing railings for belays.
The walls remain what they always were, since I started climbing there in ‘82, at least.
> Remove loose rock from Cornakey and you'll probably be at the A39 before you find anything bomber
Yes. But I don't get the impression the issue is with Cornakey, and I don't believe the same principles need apply to a famously loose sea cliff as to, for example, a bolted outcrop.
Thank you so much for your post. I've always belayed on the railings but I guess they've been steadily getting worse and the Water Board didn't seem too happy with it. So, although I'm not mad keen about bolt belays either, I can sympathise with their placement.
Given that Pex must be one of the hardest places in the country to climb well (Pisa Traverse, the most demanding V3 in the universe?), for me the compensation has always been the warmth, encouragement and camaraderie of the locals (Pete, Beau, etc). And it's great that standards are still being pushed.
Mick
> My rule was, if you had to make more than 5 seconds effort to shift a piece of loose rock, leave it be.
And my rule is that it all depends on the circumstances. When cleaning on Portland, it's not uncommon for me to spend more than 20 minutes taking a single block off. Some have taken several hours of exhausting labour. Often I've had to abandon the cleaning of new routes in favour of removal of dangerous blocks poised above existing routes. (So maybe someone else was following your rule?)
In my experience, it's a tricky old business. Best to be on the safe side.
Mick
> >
> Hi Dave
> I don't know anything about the other examples, but I believe this block came off with somebody holding onto it (or standing on it) last year (there's a comment to this effect in the logbooks) - I don't think it was an example of intentional "cleaning".
> Rick
https://www.sara-rescue.org.uk/
Woodcroft Quarry 10-10-21
The SARA rope team was called out this morning to help the South West Ambulance Service HART Team and Gloucestershire Fire and Rescue Service to evacuate two injured climbers from Woodcroft Quarry.
They had been injured as a result of a large block falling out of the cliff, and were on a ledge half way down the cliff face. Working with the other emergency services present, a SARA casualty carer and the team doctor were lowered to the casualties.
One casualty was lowered down the cliff face, and the other raised to the cliff top, and both were delivered into the care of the ambulance service. We heard this evening that both had been discharged from hospital and wish them both a speedy recovery.
Really good to hear....and thanks to all those involved. I started my climbing life at Pex around 1982....and knew it we'll before that as a kid riding our bikes. I've seen it over the years in various states from country park to vandalised tip......it's a very underrated venue.....I've watched some classy climbers there when I was learning to climb....seeing people on the main wall was so inspiring and impressive...
I think you'll find that the golden age of chipping was in the 80's though it was frowned on then and equally so today. Blaming that on wall bred climbers seems to be missing the target.
Ditto whinging about enhanced gear placements. I suspect you'll find wall bred climbers more keen on placing a bolt than creating wire placements out of marginal alien placements.
Sorry to read that somebody has to have an accident on a route before cleaning loose rock is ok. There are obviously crags where part of the appeal is the dubious quality of the rock, but as a sport I thought we'd gotten over 'designer danger' a few years ago. I would think it unlikely that the BMC are going to recommend preserving occasional loose holds on popular crags as a point of honour
Maybe you should take a look at Pexhill for yourself because the last time I climbed there the quarry looked like it had just received a visitation from a swarm of locusts.I must also say much of what has been going on there has been of dubious worth verging on environmental vandalism. If people feel the need for an allotment I would suggest they put their names down on council waiting lists.😊
> The SARA rope team was called out this morning to help the South West Ambulance Service HART Team and Gloucestershire Fire and Rescue Service to evacuate two injured climbers from Woodcroft Quarry.
The fact that Gloucestershire Fire and Rescue Service had to call out SARA to help is a little worrying.
If I'm correct didn't Gloucs F&R take over rescue duties from SARA a few years ago, with some fanfare about how capable they were.
Mind you, after they took over I did see Gloucs F&R training at Wintours - by Woodcroft Quarry - and I wasn't overly impressed with either their rope work or their ability to knock rock/stones down.
[Edit for additional] Woodcroft Quarry was never the most solid rock around, so I would like to know the route in question AND how the incident occurred, especially as both were apparently on a ledge halfway up/down. The place doesn't really need routes to be climbed in 2 pitches.
If you can pull loose holds off with your hand, fair enough. Otherwise just leave it.
https://www.ukclimbing.com/logbook/crags/wintours_leap-51/moth-32259
Described as 2 pitches. Leader doesn't remember pulling on the block on the second pitch; just waking up on the ledge!
> Described as 2 pitches. Leader doesn't remember pulling on the block on the second pitch; just waking up on the ledge!
Not a Woodcroft Quarry route then - a trifle worrying that bits are falling off here as well.
Done Moth a few times, seem to remember doing it as one pitch.
The second BMC Members Open Forum webinar took place on 20 March. Recently-appointed BMC CEO Paul Ratcliffe, President Andy Syme and Chair Roger Murray shared updates on staff changes, new and ongoing initiatives, insurance policy changes and the current...