How To Measure Glacial Retreat (for dummies)

New Topic
This topic has been archived, and won't accept reply postings.
 Timmd 03 Jan 2022

For level 5/2nd year at university, I'm needing to measure the amount a glacier has retreated between 1985 and 2019, can anybody point me to a site which explains how one might come to a rough estimate on how far a glacier has retreated? 

Many Ta's.

Edit: This being done via mapping on google Earth, without taking into account things like mass balance, it's more to do with the difference between two different lines drawn on a map.

Post edited at 19:20
 ianstevens 03 Jan 2022
In reply to Timmd:

Crudest/simplest way is the change the date of the imagery on Google earth pro (your university will probably have a sub) and use the ruler tool along the centreline.

OP Timmd 03 Jan 2022
In reply to ianstevens:

Ta. I guess the centre line would be halfway between the outer reaches/sides of the glacier? nb It is google Earth Pro we're using, my mistake in the OP.

Post edited at 19:34
 MG 03 Jan 2022
In reply to Timmd:

French maps now now glaciers as in the 1970s and currently.  Interpolate??

OP Timmd 03 Jan 2022
In reply to MG:

A classmate took 3 measurements, being the highest, lowest, and a middle one, and has averaged the 3, it's only about 5 marks for the 'how did you measure the change' bit, so that seems good enough until/unless I come across another method, I have a few weeks to ponder if I want to be more complicated than that. 

Post edited at 20:59
 summo 03 Jan 2022
In reply to Timmd:

https://vaw.ethz.ch/en/research/glaciology/glacier-monitoring.html#glamos

The Swiss have several projects, might be something useful amongst their site. 

 mbh 03 Jan 2022
In reply to Timmd:

I can't directly answer your question, but you might be interested in this site from David Archer of the U. Chicago which I made use of when I did one of his courses on Coursera a couple of years ago.

http://climatemodels.uchicago.edu

 Bottom Clinger 03 Jan 2022
In reply to Timmd:

IIRC, a regular poster in this site is a glaciologist. Will rack my brains and try and remember who. 

 ianstevens 03 Jan 2022
In reply to Bottom Clinger:

Me (although maybe you meant someone else), which is why I got in a quick reply 😂 (I have also set this assignment and variations of it myself in the past). 
 

To the OP: the centreline is a little open to interpretation, but essentially yes, equidistant between the two margins. I’d also suggest that a really good student would consider the the method isn’t perfect, and do a few repeat measurements and estimate an uncertainty… A really good student would also look at thickness change over time using the profile tool 😉 

I assume you have been given a named glacier? Or do you have to pick one?

Post edited at 22:00
OP Timmd 03 Jan 2022
In reply to ianstevens:

Thanks, yes we have a named glacier, I haven't looked yet into whether thickness can be examined via Google Earth Pro. The centre-line approach is quite vague seeming, almost tempted to take ten high and low points and find an average of them.

Many Ta's. 

Post edited at 22:40
 lithos 03 Jan 2022

some ranom thoughts...

could you do it via image processing and count the pixels in a standardised sized image? ie overlay the images.  I've no idea if this is practical given the tools

wont give depth but will give area.

i'd also want to pair up images for season and repeated images ir ot just one for 1985  and one for 2019 - if they exist !

 JLS 03 Jan 2022
In reply to lithos:

>”wont give depth but will give area.”

Wont overlaying a contour map give a fair estimate of depth loss?

EDIT: perhaps not when channelled by vertical cliffs…

Post edited at 00:00
 Toerag 04 Jan 2022
In reply to JLS:

> >”wont give depth but will give area.”

> Wont overlaying a contour map give a fair estimate of depth loss?

> EDIT: perhaps not when channelled by vertical cliffs…

Doesn't really matter as long as you know the glacier's thickness before and after - it's more or less the same volume of ice going through the channel so it doesn't matter if the depth increases temporarily in the constriction.

Post edited at 00:12
 wercat 04 Jan 2022
In reply to JLS:

this is beginning to sound like the thread about how much water is in Rutland Water!

I suggested doing a series of profiles based on contour information from the pre 1974 maps before flooding

 ianstevens 04 Jan 2022
In reply to lithos:

> some ranom thoughts...

> could you do it via image processing and count the pixels in a standardised sized image? ie overlay the images.  I've no idea if this is practical given the tools

> wont give depth but will give area.

> i'd also want to pair up images for season and repeated images ir ot just one for 1985  and one for 2019 - if they exist !

The standard procedure here is to use the end of the balance year - I.e. when the glacier is at its minimum mass. Usually September in the northern hemisphere.

 ianstevens 04 Jan 2022
In reply to JLS:

Yup, you can grab a profile from the DEM in GEPro, which is essentially what you are describing.

if it’s a Swiss glacier lots of them have very useful publicly available data on GLAMOS 

 Trevers 05 Jan 2022
In reply to Timmd:

I'm possibly the other UKC resident glaciologist, unless there are others hiding out here (not unlikely, many of us climb).

Disappointingly enough, I can't give you a precise answer. I've not really worked with alpine glaciers, and trying to actually determine where a glacier ends from satellite imagery is often pretty ambiguous.

A good place to start would be the Randolph Glacier Inventory (https://www.glims.org/maps/glims). I've not used it myself but I believe they have an archive of glacier outlines for thousands of glaciers in a vector format you could import into Google Earth, GIS software or manipulate with a python package. They may have multiple outlines from different years for your glacier.

As ianstevens says, you want to measure along a centre line. I don't know if the RGI provides these. You could always plot one in Google Earth from the satellite view by delineating along some feature such as a medial moraine. There are more involved methods but something crude will probably suit the assignment fine.

Post edited at 00:20
OP Timmd 05 Jan 2022
In reply to Trevers:

Many thanks to yourself, and others too. 

I don't suppose you know what you'd call a circular and shallow indentation as a landform left behind by a glacier moving across it, too, and what process might create it?

It's not a deep feature, relative to it's size, but almost like a thin layer of rock, or paint for an analogy, has been picked away, but in bedrock.

Post edited at 20:10

New Topic
This topic has been archived, and won't accept reply postings.
Loading Notifications...