In reply to Baron Weasel:
My favourite was a metal tub at the Yosemite Bug that was zero chlorine, with a low level of peroxide and a UV treatment system.
My take is that it's better to have an ultra-low chlorine system with a multi-wavelength UV system The UV both destroys microbial stuff and busts apart the smelly chloramines formed when chlorine binds to all the organic crap in there. It sounds like this is more effective and it avoids the skin and eye issues of normal chlorine levels, some of which are down to the chloramines.
The issue for me is that UV bulbs are nasty and short lifetime and don't take kindly to being turned on and off a lot so are an energy sink. The bulbs can also shatter and feed glass shards into the plumbing. With the way UV LED development is going I think we'll see LED devices in a few years which will address all these issues.
Then you get in to the question of filters. Proper filtration seems to make a big difference. My current (and first) hot tub is a small green Lidl paddling pool modified to circulate water through a very course outtake screen, a coarse Y-strainer, a small paper cartridge fine filter and an 80 litre wood burner from Eldom [1]. We don't use it often and when we do it's single use tap water that's then drained into the garden. The filter gets cleaned after each use; the water temperature is pushing the manufacture's specs for the filter cartridge. Before and after photos below. This uses a little 24 V DC pump running of an isolated supply and an inventive mix of "Hozelock" style hosepipe plumbing, a shower hose, 32 mm metric solvent-weld PVC pressure pipe and 38 mm flexible hose. The latest iteration has eliminated the 1/2" BSP bulkhead connector running through a solvent-weld end stop and all self-amalgam tape, it's almost professional like...
[1] https://www.amazon.co.uk/Heater-Burning-Boiler-Enameld-Vertical/dp/B06W9DWJ...
Post edited at 16:06