In reply to rka:
You say it's a 425kW scheme, I presume that's peak generator capacity? What's the peak export capacity? How much surplus energy per flood do you think you could store in an ideal world, I presume you've modeled this?
Even assuming you're only looking to store a small fraction of that peak output the storage and conversion cost is going to be significant. You describe a flashy burn, if a flood allowing peak generation lasts say 6H and, guessing you're at about 50% peak capacity under normal flow conditions (because why oversize the machinery much more than necessary) that's: 6*0.5*425=1,275kWH of storage needed. Ignoring conversion losses if you sell all of the stored surplus at 20p/kWH to the community that's ~£250/flood, maybe £5-10k/year extra income from an investment that at a *very* rough £150/kWH would cost you at least £200k, quite likely 2-4x that all in with little hope even considering the long term increased flexibility it would give you over when to sell of recouping the investment before the battery needed replacement. How far would that sort of money go toward increasing your export capacity? Maybe that's the sort of budget and return you had in mind or maybe some of my numbers are miles of but it sounds to me like a problem that potentially isn't worth solving at current prices.
How close is your community, how big and convenient for local housing/amenities is your parking lot, how good are your flow forecasts... could you dump it directly into other people's EV batteries parked on site for a more modest supplemental income?
Could you sell the surplus directly as heat instead? Most of the surplus is presumably available in the cooler months (assuming northern Europe).
Can the flashiness be reduced? That seems to be generally desirable anyway from a flood alleviation perspective so an opportunity maybe to leverage your investment by engaging other stakeholders. How many saplings and beavers would your £200k get you
jk
Post edited at 10:19