In reply to Philip:
> My wife clips a car that pulled out from a stationary lane on a roundabout into her path. From her point it's his fault, from his it's hers for not seeing him do this.
I'd agree with her, for what it's worth - if you are going to cross a dashed line into another lane, you have to give way to anyone already in that lane.
> She let her insurer know as he will be claiming on his. But now she has a dilmena:
> 1. Get her car repaired on insurance, pay £250 excess and hopefully get it back, but if they settle knock-for-knock she'll lose her no claims and have paid £250 for a repair that won't really cost that.
> 2. Not get it repaired through insurance, hope they uphold it as his fault and she keeps no claims - probably costs ~£75 for smart repair.
> 3. Not get it repaired, but loses dispute and therefore loses no claims and has to pay for her repair.
Not sure to be honest, each has upsides and downsides. Re 3 I think "knock for knock" technically means "each insurer pays 50% of the overall claim" rather than "each pays for their own" which means the no claims may be lost either way (only way to know is to ask).
> Her insurance provider - Quote Me Happy - have not been in touch, and seem to be impossible to talk to.
I think there's two lessons here.
1. Don't go with the cheapest insurer, also research how good they are when it comes to a claim.
2. Always go protected no claims. You'll still see a small premium increase for an accident due to the risk calculation, but the effect is much smaller and the fee for this is also small.
Post edited at 20:16