In reply to jkarran:
As I understand it:
Stephen Kinnock's amendment went through without a vote, despite the No lobby being packed because the government did not provide tellers and a second verbal check was made when the No voters were not in the chamber (as they were in the No Lobby. Bloody dodgy stuff.
His amendment could be read to bring the TM deal back to the house for another vote (I'm not sure it does)
This amendment could usually be stripped in the Lords and sent back to the house.... but of course there's no time for that.
Nigel Benn has said they probably won't strip it for this reason, and it doesn't prevent the purpose - to prevent no deal.
Read this commentary thread from here: https://twitter.com/IanDunt/status/1169315285540777984
This all happened under a deputy speaker, and you can clearly her him being prompted to pass the bill (not sure who by) followed by a call of "Excellent" this is after the first announcement of the vote and a division https://twitter.com/alexpartridge87/status/1169317676021407744
Post edited at 21:59