/ Solo summit Mont Blanc guidance needed.
Hi can anyone give me some advice on a solo attempt on the summit of Mont Blanc.
I will hopefully have an opportunity to attempt this next summer. I have been around plenty of known UK hill routes solo including scrambling routes such as Snowdon Horseshoe, Scafell Pike etc. fortunately none of them have posed too many issues. I now feel ready to attempt a climb on a “proper” mountain. After doing some research I believe Mont Blanc is achievable with the right preparation and not a bad place to start. I am not a member of any clubs and the guided group tours on offer don’t look very appealing In the end I concluded its probably best to just do it solo and walk up via the Gouter Route. As I have no Alpine experience can anyone make any recommendations as how best to prepare over the forthcoming winter, fitness etc.? Also advice on route finding and potential pitfalls (besides the Couloir) along the route up as only thing that puts me off is falling down a crevasse on my own.
I soloed it as my first ever alpine peak, with no acclimatisation. Had done Rysy in Winter and Toubkal in the Spring in the months leading up to it.
Don’t let anyone tell you it’s not doable, but don’t believe it’s a safe walk in the park either.. I was probably a bit naive at the time. Three roped people died between the Grand Couloir and the Gouter Hut on the same day as my ascent, which really put things in to perspective (and strangely glad I didn’t have a partner!)
The route is mostly a walk but there is sustained but equipped grade 1/2 scrambling up to the hut so hill fitness would serve you best.
if your needing to ask these questions then you shouldnt be attempting to solo it!
I soloed Mont Blanc in 1997 via the Gouter which I also used to descend. I don't think the 3m's would have been an appropriate route. I didn't see anything that looked like a crevasse but that doesn't mean they were not there. The trail above the Gouter hut was deep snow but a trench had formed that was about 2 or 3 feet deep. I can't comment on current conditions but I found it very straightforward at the time. Yes a few rocks came down the Grande Couloir on the descent but to be honest people above me knocking rocks off on the rock ridge seemed like a bigger danger as they were far more frequent. Depending on the depth of the snow it is often possible to make use of a fixed rope across the couloir. At the time it would have been more trouble than it was worth to use it as it was a long way out and I would have needed a rope to make use of it so I just scooted across as quickly as I could.
I would add however that I had many years alpine experience before I did it. I would not recommend it if you do not have any alpine experience.
Thank you for all the replies, really appreciate it.
I understand that for some having to ask these questions would suggest it’s not a good idea, however no matter the quantity research I have carried out I don’t have the opportunity to ask those with real experience of the mountain directly as I simply don’t know any, The response from the small group of walkers I know has been “don’t bother”, so not very helpful! I simply wanted to get to the point and avoid wasting any time being disillusioned by what is involved.
Just don't forget retreat is long and altitude is significant.
I solo'd Mont Blanc this year (July). It was an amazing experience. Obviously the advice is to take a suitable guide and put safety first.
I prepared for 2 years for this ascent, and before starting my trip, I had been over the route a million times in various formats from maps, books, satellite and streetview (yep, someone must have been paid well by Google). I would advise getting out in the Scottish winter on some treks etc. Good crampon skills are required, especially for some of the ridges nearer the summit. I bought most of the kit, but did hire a GPS device, which I would recommend. The route was easy to follow, but in the unforeseen events, it's beneficial to have one. Definitely don't skimp on kit. I did take some rope, prusiks, carabiners etc for crevasse rescue just in case. . There were a couple of hefty crevasses on the route this year. Try not to weight yourself down with too much equipment though
It goes without saying that climbing experience is very handy. Being able to rope yourself up, glacial traverse, crevasse identification and what to do when encountered etc will all reduce risk and give you a more safe and enjoyable ascent.
In terms of acclimatisation, my itinerary was as follows;
- Ascend to Refuge Bellachat and stay (2.3k)
- Summit Le Brevent (2.5k)
- Cable car up the Midi and stay at Cosmiques (3.8k and 3.6k). This was an amazing night.
- Ascent MB to Tete Rousse
- Summit day and back to Tete Rousse
- Return back to the valley.
I did incorporate a rest day after Le Brevent due to timings of getting down. Obviously it goes without saying that everyone acclimatises differently, but it is not to be underestimated. Especially if you have not been at altitude before. Ideally you should have experience of this. You should also plan this carefully and alternative options.
I would strongly recommend lots of aerobic training as well. Summit day can be circa 14 hours and it does get tough. Mentally, going solo is difficult as it's just down to you to push you up, rather than a group encouraging eachother on.
The Couloir to start in darkness was pretty dangerous. Even at 1:00am, rocks were falling. I'd take your time getting up the ridge to the Gouter, making sure you are safe, and using the fixed line where possible.
As long as you have prepared sufficiently and are in top fitness, this 'should' be achievable. Just remember that the mountain will always be there. If you don't feel prepared enough, defer it for another year. It's worth the wait. Also, when you are there, remember that the summit isn't everything. If the conditions don't permit, or start to change, don't hesitate to turn back and go another time. Once again, it'll always be there. Don't become a statistic of people who just want to 'bag the tall mountain' and end up being wholly unprepared and underestimate it.
There is a wealth of information out there on this and people on here with great experience and knowledge. Also remember that people who tell you not to do it are just looking out for your safety.
Bring ear plugs!!!!!
Good luck and stay safe!!
> I did take some rope, prusiks, carabiners etc for crevasse rescue just in case. . There were a couple of hefty crevasses on the route this year.
Just curious: what were you going to do with those once you'd arrived at the bottom of the crevasse?
The list of your "mountaineering" experience is painfully short.
May I suggest that you first try something with an experienced partner?
People die on the Gouter Route regularly, most have problems with altitude.
4-6 days of acclimatization should be enough to sort the altitude issue out, if you work hard on those days.
Do you have any crampon, ice axe, exposed ridge experience?
The UK routes you mention bear no resemblance to the Alps. You don't mention whether you have any winter experience in the UK - familiarity and confidence with using ice axe and crampons is essential.
I attempted the Gouter route a few years ago but had to turn back due to altitude, so I descended solo while my companions carried on. I was confident doing so because it isn't particularly technical, and you should have no difficulty from that point of view. It had felt fairly safe going up, however descending in daylight I was surprised to see more crevasses than had been apparent when going up in the dark. The path is obvious, and I was not the only one travelling unroped, but the thing about crevasses is that even if plenty of people have passed them safely you can never be quite sure until they open up beneath you. If that happens when you are unroped you are in big trouble.
I believe that the upper part of the ridge is quite narrow, and you could face parties travelling in both directions. You will need to be confident being unroped on steep, exposed and icy ground while other climbers try to push past you.
The truth is that soloing comes with enormous risks, especially in the Alps. What worries me is that you don't appear to have sufficient experience either in the UK or the Alps to make the necessary judgements. I was appallingly naive on my first few Alpine trips, and when I look back I now wonder what on earth we were thinking - but we didn't go alone and unroped.
I certainly wouldn't be recommending to anyone with no prior Alpine experience that it is OK to solo anything (anyone with experience shouldn't need to ask). Whilst you'll probably be absolutely fine and will wonder what the fuss was about, there is a fair possibility that you might never be seen again. At least there will be plenty of other climbers on the Gouter route, but if you get into trouble when unroped they probably won't be in a position to help you.
Somewhere on Youtube (I can't find the link) is a video of someone who clipped into the wire across the Grand Couloir with a sling to his harness. He ended up being lifted off the ground by the tension in the cable and was suspended swinging helplessly right in the path of the stonefall, unable to move or get down. Don't do that!
I would ask, why plan to solo? It's easy to find a partner in Chamonix. I do solo things on occasion if I can't find a partner for whatever reason, but on a route like the Gouter your main risks are altitude problems, or ending up in a hidden crevasse. Both situations in which you will want a partner.
If you insist however, the route is straightforward enough if you have some winter walking experience, but on a much bigger and more serious scale. You would not want to be caught up high in bad weather. If you go in summer there will be plenty of people around if things do go south, but relying on other parties for your safety is impolite at best. Route finding is non-existent in good conditions, just follow the stepped in trail. Fitness wise, a lot of cardio and leg workouts should do the job. Do some other routes to acclimatise, the Aiguille du Tour or Gran Paradiso are good starts.
Why does your first experience of the Alps need to be the highest peak?
A friend of mine, with plenty of UK hilkwalking experience, did Mont Blanc on a guided Alpine Skills course. He said it was the scariest experience of his life! He has never walked/climbed in snow/ice since...
I have been around plenty of known UK hill routes solo including scrambling routes such as Snowdon Horseshoe, Scafell Pike etc. fortunately none of them have posed too many issues. I now feel ready to attempt a climb on a “proper” mountain.
On a good day the Gouter route to the top of Mt Blanc is little more than a path if you're an experienced mountaineer but that doesn't make it easy or risk free. The couloir has falling rocks and therefore you need to pick your moment and be quick; that means moving swiftly and efficiently in crampons without catching your trousers and falling. Have you used an axe before in anger (as opposed to swinging one about in your hand as you walk)? Have you used crampons on uneven terrain whilst utterly knackered, hungry and dehydrated? Have you navigated down narrow aretes in total white outs while trying to work out where the point is to cut off onto another slope?
Being fit might help you but it's not going to mask your inexperience. People die in the mountains from being unprepared and inexperienced, and most of them will have probably thought that it wouldn't happen to them. But that doesn't help their friends and families who have to deal with the consequences. In the grand scheme of the alpine world Mt Blanc via the gouter is straightforward, but that isn't the same as saying it's easy or risk free.
By all means set your sights on doing it but either pay a guide, or do the necessary prep work before hand. Climbing and alpinism is an apprenticeship but too many people think they can shortcut this and use strength or fitness to achieve their goals. But this doesn't make them skilled if they succeed, merely lucky. At the end of the day you need to have the skills to operate in the alpine and mountain environment safely, and that comes with experience and time spent climbing with people who have the experience already. Crevasse rescue kit is utterly useless if you don't know how to use it, as are axes and crampons. All they allow you to do is get further up the mountain before you need to request help from the mountain rescue when you get out your depth.
Lots of excellent advice from people above. The BMC article is great, you may find these useful too:
I have climbed MB several times both solo and with partners and on several different routes over the years, none of them guided. You either need to gain the knowledge, skills, experience, fitness and acclimatisation required as outlined above ( plus ensuring the weather and route conditions are good too ) or join an experienced partner / group or hire a guide.
Enjoy the journey
Forgot to mention, as you did ask what you could do to prepare over winter - get up to Scotland and do some big hill days, get used to walking in crampons and using your axe, stuff like CMD arete or other grade I ridges.
> As I have no Alpine experience can anyone make any recommendations as how best to prepare over the forthcoming winter, fitness etc.?
Do you have any experience in the UK in winter - crampons n axe etc? Any long winter days in Scotland - Glencoe, Lochaber, Cuillins, Caringorms - starts in the dark etc? Loads of mileage in this would probably be a good shout for preparation. Also multiple days on the trot at 9/10 hrs a piece.
How about paying a guide in the UK for a 1-1 Alpine Preparation Course - someone who has been there and done it, and can apply their knowledge to similar terrain in the UK - expensive, but less expensive that the cost of repatriation of body back to the UK.
There are loads of previous Mont Blanc threads on here about prep and training.
edit - JStearn just beat me to it with exactly the same advice
I did it last July as a 50th birthday present to myself. I live less than 4 hours drive away so I said why not?
I drove up to Chamonix, met a friend and we spent a day up in the Aiguilles Rouges. Not very high and not ideal acclimatisation but I only had a maximum of 5 nights away from home.
Next day I parked the car in Les Houches and got the Bellevue cable car up to where you can get the Mont Blanc tram to Nid d'Aigle. I hiked from Nid d'Aigle to the Tette Rousse and got there about 14h. I had two nights booked there and the mountain Gendarme about just down from the TR hut did check I had booked a bunk.
In the afternoon I hiked to the couloir and sat under a safe rock shelf and had a very entertaining hour watching the guides literally drag their clients across the couloir in between the afternoon stonefall.
I was up for brecky at 1:15 and out the door at 1:45. The Gouter ridge in the dark was ace,
Once on the Dome I could turn my headtorch off as it was almost full moon and very bright. Temperature was perfect.
I was somewhere around the Valot hut for sunrise then on the summit at about 7am.
Back at the Tete Rousse for about 11am where I collected my stuff, descended and I just got the 13h train from Nid d'Aigle back to the cable car and I was drinking beer in Cham at 15h.
My only previous Alpine experience prior to this was the Cosmic Arete about 7 years ago.
I had it in my head that in the case of any bad weather or headache I would go down. Only problem I encountered was a group about 12 east European military people all on one rope climbing the Bosses ridge. I had to stop, move to the side and let them through. You wouldn't want to slip here.
Other than that I saw one close crevase near the Gouter hut.
I commited to doing this just based on my cycling fitness (250km + rides in June and July) Problem was different muscles and I couldn't walk properly for about a week afterwards ;-)
I typed this on my phone with fat fingers. ^^^^^^
Anyone know why I can't see the edit button?
Just to echo what people have said above and on previous threads where a similar question has been asked. It’s true that, for an alpine route, the Gouter Route is relatively easy technically when in good condition. However a relatively easy Alpine route is still way more challenging and dangerous than summer hillwalking in the UK.
To attempt a solo ascent (or even a roped up ascent with an inexperienced partner) without being solid on your feet in crampons is pure madness. The route crosses very exposed slopes in places. If you slip there (tiredness, ice, tripping over your crampons) and you aren’t well versed in ice axe arrest, you may well die if you slip. Simple as that.
There are a multitude of other risks as well. What if the weather comes in, as it can do surprisingly quickly even on a blue sky day? Disorientated and unable to navigate in a white out, especially if there isn’t a good track (there might not be if there’s been recent snow fall), with the weather deteriorating. Not good.
If you fall in a crevasse, not good.
If you get exhausted due to inappropriate tactics, not good.
Plenty more things that can go wrong and mean you won’t get to the summit or worse.
Yes, relative beginners can do the route but they do it with a guide whose job it is to keep them out of trouble and maximise the chances of a successful ascent and safe return (even then, not everyone will get to the summit - but at least they will get back down safely).
If you don’t know a suitably experienced partner, I would suggest booking a Mont Blanc course with a guide. Ideally a week or longer, so you have time for technical prep, an acclimatisation ascent or two and to get more options with getting a weather window. You’ll have a great time and learn new skills, some of which would come in handy for winter walking / mountaineering back home. A winter walking course in Scotland would also pay dividends.
My goodness, street view up a mountain, if I had really good air con and some vr googles I'd be sat on my arse in my office enjoying the view!
Mountaineering is inherently dangerous, and staying as safe as possible is all about how we manage and try to minimise the risks. Solo crossing a glacier with hidden crevasses is like walking through a minefield, or playing Russian roulette, it's a risk some are happy to accept, but one which others, including myself, feel is a risk too far. The choice is yours, no one else can tell you whether or not you should take it, but having lost, not one, but two friends, through fatal crevasse falls it's not a risk I'm happy to take. Many decades ago I fell into a hidden crevasse whilst leading and roped to two others. One second I was happily trudging in the sun through the beautiful mountain environment we all know and love, the next I found myself hanging free, suspended over a gaping abyss and could see the outline of my two companions through the frighteningly thin snow bridge above me. Getting out using prussiks was a real struggle as the rope had bitten deeply into the snow. Without that life line I would have died. Ever since then I've had a horror of dying by falling into one and becoming wedged by the constriction of a crevasse sides in the freezing darkness.
To do a route like this you need to be acclimatised to the situation, as well as the altitude, so you can stay calm and in control, and yet remain aware of the risks. The first time my wife and I did the Alps the sheer scale of things caused her to hyperventilate, and this was someone who was totally fine scrambling just about anything North Wales had to offer - and I wasn't feeling very Zen about it all either. Obviously everyone is different, but it might be wise to do a fair bit of less potentially lethal stuff first, just to get your head right.
Another thing you need is excellent crampon skills. It is all well and good thinking that you can self arrest, but that might not work. Just look at this video. This guy was very lucky, especially given his poor arrest skills, but it could have so easily have ended in a fatality, and this is comparable ground to what you will find on the Bosses ridge.
I must admit that I too soloed Mt Blanc many years ago. But now I am older and a bit wiser I wouldn't even consider it. Climbing it means nothing - thousands have done so, so why take the risk of soloing it?
> I must admit that I too soloed Mt Blanc many years ago. But now I am older and a bit wiser I wouldn't even consider it. Climbing it means nothing - thousands have done so, so why take the risk of soloing it?
So did I and the Matterhorn, too ! Practically everything climbable has been climbed, choosing to solo and add a little spice to the experience of climbing M.Blanc is understandable. Just survive, young Sir ( I take it you're young) and cherish the memory when you too, in the future would advise someone in your current position to renounce !
I'm not young any more, as my 60th is not far off.
Perhaps it is sign of getting old and being more acutely aware of my mortality, but when I look back on the risks I have taken it the past I don't cherish the memory, just think how foolish I was.
This perception is doubtlessly coloured by the fact that I took a bad fall when solo rock climbing the Peak, shattering my ankle, the result of which has been 20-odd years of pain. Even now running gives me that awful 'twisted ankle' pain at each foot-fall and I have just had to learn to live with it, which is fun when running an ultra.
My only consolation is that my fall made me reconsider the whole game, so saving myself from something potentially far more serious. I used to think that the likes of John Redhead were the ultimate in climbing. Now I look beyond the egos and 'macho BS' and think that the only sane climbing route is one with bolts in it, or at least bomber gear. I recall an article I read years ago (in issue 111 of 'On the Edge') by someone called Sally Haycock and now wish I had seen their wisdom a lot earlier. (See below.) Climbing is just another hobby which should be done for enjoyment and no hobby is worth a lifetime of pain from a climbing injury, let alone death - at least I regret trying to play the 'head game', and will probably regret it even more when the arthritis takes hold. As Haycock put it:
Climbers aren't happy, and they certainly aren't normal...I know it for a fact. You are all maladjusted weirdoes... You tell everyone you're risk takers, adrenaline athletes, vertical ballerinas. Quest-seekers, the last great adventurers in a technological age. Meanwhile you come to blows over arbitrary, illogical, irrelevant ethics fervently praying that the real world blows over and leaves you alone. I really did make an effort: I went climbing a few times...But the effort can't all be one way- how many times can you watch 'Hard Grit' without thinking, 'what a complete waste of time'.
Because at the end of the day climbing, like running or swimming, is a physical activity that can be practised and performed. It is not a noble art giving the artist enlightenment and superiority over other mortals. It is a hobby. Why can you not see that?
I asked myself when climbing a long time ago - is this a pleasure ? So many people I have encountered climb like they are having a tooth out and are thrilled by the rush of relief they get by still being in one piece afterwards - like walking out of the dentist.
Sorry I cant identify with any of that, i get a huge amount of climbing and the risks associated with it. I would be a much lesser person if it wasn't through the experiences I've had and the relationships I've built undertaking risky activities. Yes the stakes can sometimes be high, much higher than any potential reward but if you lived your life without any risk youd never leave the house.
Saying 'if you lived your life without any risk you'd never leave the house' is setting up something of a straw man.
As many other posters on here seem to agree the real issue is not exposing one's self to dangers that are out of all proportion to the potential reward. For example, soloing on a route that is only just within one's comfort zone or a solo attempt on Mt. Blanc without any prior experience.
Despite all the 'macho BS' surrounding risk and the idolisation of climbers willing to run a serious risk of death (many of whom seem to be have serious psychological issues) it seems to me that most climbers are, in reality, obsessed with safety - just look at all the discussions about safety equipment from helmets to the latest hardware, or the multi-page threads generated whenever someone asks if they should bin that rope that have had in storage for a few years!
I can recommend you a few guides if you're interested. I've used guided in Scotland and Cham there experience is worth every penny I've learnt so much!
Great point. There's a lot of reasons why people are questioning this. Primarily alpine climbing is about decision making, risk is managed through experience and judgement. Killian Jornet recently wrote a post on how his solo ascents aren't just big trail runs but they are super light Alpinism.
Before deciding to commit he thoroughly familiarises himself with the route in a variety of conditions and seeks advice from people who travel the route regularly where and what the objective dangers are.
In my limited experience in the Alps I've learned a huge amount and quite simply have seen how different crevassed areas appear week to week and especially year to year. It's worth mentioning that it's often only when you view the glacier from above that you realise that the small cracks you crossed were part of a huge crevasse network and that place that you stopped to tie your shoe lace was the middle of a huge snow bridge, you will see others do exactly the same.
My recent trip showed me that even a facile route which traverses freshly groomed piestes can be heavily crevassed and requires care and a rope when conditions aren't as good as they had been three years ago. Sure people were moving unroped but we had checked out the glacier the day before and the piested snow bridges were only two inches thick, even on the cold morning holes were reappearing. This is an example of how temporary conditions can give an illusion of safety but the reality is different.
So my questions for you relate to judgement. Why do you feel the need to do this solo? Why not another route less serious? How are you realistically going to prepare?
Honestly do you know the hazards intimately? Do you know the real likelihood of consequence? Do you know how to mitigate this risk? Don't kid yourself on this. We are constantly learning.
Finally are you exposing yourself to heuristic traps? Are you aware of their ability to influence your rational decision making? The big question is why solo it when your experience is limited? Why not wait. Over commitment? Social proof? Maybe it's best to not be held to ransom by these false gods.
Good point, sorry I reacted I bit strongly to your post, I saw it as an an unfair attack on many aspects of climbing that I know and love. You are right, one of the key skills of climbing and mountaineering is assessing the risks, understanding them and deciding whether they are acceptable to you. Which is why I think you don't get any 'macho bs' from people who know what there doing, (unlike from say Bear Grylls). Ultimately if you don't understand the risks you shouldn't be doing it!
>”Ultimately if you don't understand the risks you shouldn't be doing it!”
A quick google suggests that about 20,000 people attempt Mont Blanc each year and there will be around a dozen deaths.
So as a baseline the OP’s chances of death sit at around 1/1600.
Given the OP’s current experience, proposed route and plan to go solo, where does the THREAD think the OP’s odds sit with those additional factors taken into consideration. I’m guessing the odds won’t have improved on the baseline figure but I wonder just how low they are and at what point the OP would judge the venture not worth the risk...
> You are right, one of the key skills of climbing and mountaineering is assessing the risks, understanding them and deciding whether they are acceptable to you.
Which generally means knowing that one has sufficient skills and knowledge to be able to reduce the actual risk to a relatively minimal level, with death or injury being pretty unlikely. However the tabloids might sometimes portray climbers I think that few really approach the hobby with the mindset of someone playing Russian Roulette!
Despite the stuff one reads about approaching climbs with a 'warrior mentality', accepting that 'today is a good day to die' and other such 'Macho BS' (no need to name names) surely only someone with little to live for, who has some serious personal issues that really should be worked through, a huge ego, or a desperate need for the affirmation of their peer group, really approaches the hobby of climbing in such a way. Sure, one might get a healthy jolt of adrenaline running it out above one's last bit of gear, and in the mountains there is always the risk of something going wrong, but this just makes most people take more care.
I think that atthedropofahat makes a really good point when they say:
> Finally are you exposing yourself to heuristic traps? Are you aware of their ability to influence your rational decision making? The big question is why solo it when your experience is limited? Why not wait. Over commitment? Social proof? Maybe it's best to not be held to ransom by these false gods.
People climb for a multitude of reasons, but many are not very healthy. At a low level I think that most people get a kick out of being able to climb a grade harder than their mates - even if their best is just HVS - but ultimately being able to 'stand high' amongst one's mates is hardly a good reason to risk injury. Similarly, I recall reading about John Dunne's first ascent of Parthian Shot and him saying that the supposed risk of death was overshadowed by his ambition - effectively meaning that the climb would cement his reputation as a hard, bold climber within the climbing community. Again, I'm not convinced that the need to achieve such affirmation from one's peer group is actually very positive.
I wouldn't want to rattle too many cages, so it is probably best to expand on this point by looking at those who achieve the heights in other realms. For example, Chris Boardman has talked about the way top sportspeople, including himself, are generally not happy and use sport to achieve some sort of self affirmation, often because of deep personal issues. Good examples include Grahame Obree whose self-loathing and insecurity about his sexuality led him to literally try to ride himself to death on the bike, something that took hims to the top of the sport but didn't really resolve his personal issues and he ended up trying to commit suicide. Much the same story with Robert Millar, now Philippa York. There is a growing awareness of the prevalence of depression, self-loathing, a lack of self esteem and so on amongst elite athletes, so perhaps instead of being lionised they should really be pitied, even if their issues drive them to the highest levels of performance.
Sure, the mountains are wonderful, life affirming places, and the drive for competence is hugely rewarding, but I think that anyone who climbs for 'social proof' in any form - even if that means nothing more than getting a few more FaceBook 'likes' - really should consider their motivations, and certainly not do anything that might end badly.
Apologies for length, etc.
> Apologies for length, etc.
A pleasure to read.
This Alpine Conditions page gives a summary of what is being climbed at the moment, what is 'in' nick and what the prospects are...
Lake District-based runner Kim Collison has set a new speed record on the Bob Graham Round in winter. Kim completed the round in just 15 hours 47 minutes, knocking a big chunk from the previous fastest winter time of 18:18 set by Jim Mann in 2013.