In reply to Blue Straggler:
Thanks for replying.
> Why does the leader build his belay stance on a tiny little ridge when there is an obvious and more sensible looking ridge ledge sort of thing 8-10 metres higher? He has enough rope and doesn't look like he's too tired or scared to continue.
Not sure about that.
> Can a person pull ~35m of dynamic rope upward with enough force to pull an adult man off his feet when the rope tangles around one of his feet?
I think the point here is that the 2 waiting to climb have taken their eyes off the ball somewhat, getting involved in bird watching and photography. Someone could be off balance when the rope is caught around a foot, causing them to fall when the rope is pulled upwards I would have thought.
> Why aren't the seconds anchored to the mountain (although attached to each other by a few metres of rope?)
I thought they were, albeit on too long a bite, else how else do they not deck out.
> The leader looks very concerned about the state of his two-point anchor using snapgates, although in the "emergency" it seems to become more solid when he adds the force of his quickly-rigged abseil, to the weight of the two seconds that had seemed to be threatening its integrity.
Perhaps he's got a healthy dose of paranoia, always handy in climbing. I sometimes get worried about my anchors but learn to trust them as they appear to be doing the job.
> And later in the film when they don't climb because it's raining, and leave their helmets behind "to save weight", why do they have a load of shovels?
Sorry, I don't remember the shovels bit.
Personally, I think the film is a good effort in climbing terms. I don't remember "safe", or "off belay" in many other features. A bold move when you consider the majority of paying public may not understand the origins or significance of climbing calls.