Killings in the Highlands

New Topic
This topic has been archived, and won't accept reply postings.
 Cog 26 Jan 2021

I always think climbing scenes in films are funny.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/m000rs2n/a-lonely-place-to-die

 louiswain 26 Jan 2021
In reply to Cog:

Is that Angel out of Home and Away?

In reply to Cog:

I actually went to see this film in the cinema back in the days of Orange Wednesdays for the opening sequence of climbing in Glencoe. Must have given missus the impression it was through and through climbing film though as she got up and walked out when the lass got shot in head! That'll teach her for not asking what the film was called haha  

 Blue Straggler 27 Jan 2021
In reply to Cog:

Before the film was released, there was a lot of chatter on this forum about how there was finally going to be a proper accurate trad climbing aspect to a small major cinema release because the brothers who made it had “climbed” the Matterhorn for “research” and were quoted as saying it won’t be Cliffhanger/Vertical Limit. Forum posters were so excited, it was a bit embarrassing and tragic. Tragedy compounded when I was the first to report on the actual film. I seem to remember posting “there is 6 minutes of trad and at least 80% of it is wrong” 😃

6
 Blue Straggler 27 Jan 2021
In reply to louiswain:

> Is that Angel out of Home and Away?

yes but don’t tell her. She gets angry when Home and Away is mentioned. 

 Mark Collins 27 Jan 2021
In reply to Blue Straggler:

> Before the film was released, there was a lot of chatter on this forum about how there was finally going to be a proper accurate trad climbing aspect to a small major cinema release because the brothers who made it had “climbed” the Matterhorn for “research” and were quoted as saying it won’t be Cliffhanger/Vertical Limit. Forum posters were so excited, it was a bit embarrassing and tragic. Tragedy compounded when I was the first to report on the actual film. I seem to remember posting “there is 6 minutes of trad and at least 80% of it is wrong” 😃

In terms of the trad being wrong, would you mind providing an example please?

 Blue Straggler 27 Jan 2021
In reply to Mark Collins:

Have you seen it? Did you work on the film? Have you ever climbed multipitch trad? 

1
 Mark Collins 27 Jan 2021
In reply to Blue Straggler:

> Have you seen it? Did you work on the film? Have you ever climbed multipitch trad? 

Yes, No, Yes.

 ThunderCat 27 Jan 2021
In reply to Cog:

Can someone tell me - at 54:29, is that someone standing directly in shot behind the two shooters? Visible again at about 54:38?  White top, blue pants. 

Or is it just a blurred tree?

In reply to Cog:

Don't know about funny but the scenery of Strathconon was great. Crap storyline.

 Blue Straggler 27 Jan 2021
In reply to Mark Collins:

> In terms of the trad being wrong, would you mind providing an example please?

Why does the leader build his belay stance on a tiny little ridge when there is an obvious and more sensible looking ridge ledge sort of thing 8-10 metres higher? He has enough rope and doesn't look like he's too tired or scared to continue. 

Can a person pull ~35m of dynamic rope upward with enough force to pull an adult man off his feet when the rope tangles around one of his feet?

Why aren't the seconds anchored to the mountain (although attached to each other by a few metres of rope?)

The leader looks very concerned about the state of his two-point anchor using snapgates, although in the "emergency" it seems to become more solid when he adds the force of his quickly-rigged abseil, to the weight of the two seconds that had seemed to be threatening its integrity. 

And later in the film when they don't climb because it's raining, and leave their helmets behind "to save weight", why do they have a load of shovels? 
 

2
In reply to Blue Straggler:

> Why does the leader build his belay stance on a tiny little ridge when there is an obvious and more sensible looking ridge ledge sort of thing 8-10 metres higher? He has enough rope and doesn't look like he's too tired or scared to continue. 

Perhaps because if they did everything totally realistically and safely then the film would be boring.

 Blue Straggler 27 Jan 2021
In reply to tom_in_edinburgh:

> Perhaps because if they did everything totally realistically and safely then the film would be boring.

Oh bless you Tom. I was answering Mark’s question. It’s usually me that defends unrealistic climbing scenes in films, in the same way that you have done. But I was directly asked to explain what was technically wrong.

Also. Why did the Gilbeys spend a disproportionate amount of their pre-release promotional waffle going on about how they had gone to great pains to get everything right and realistic, even at one point iirc literally saying “there won’t be any of that stupid Vertical Limit thing with characters perilously dangling at the end of a rope”, when the opening scene does EXACTLY THAT THING? 

 Blue Straggler 27 Jan 2021
In reply to tom_in_edinburgh:

> Perhaps because if they did everything totally realistically and safely then the film would be boring.

Watch the last twenty minutes of Scream of Stone and tell me if it’s boring 

 Blue Straggler 27 Jan 2021
In reply to tom_in_edinburgh:

Have you watched this film, Tom? 

In reply to Blue Straggler:

I haven't seen Scream of Stone, I've seen this film with the climbing in the highlands.   I thought it was OK as a thriller.

Post edited at 05:56
 Mark Collins 28 Jan 2021
In reply to Blue Straggler:

Thanks for replying. 

> Why does the leader build his belay stance on a tiny little ridge when there is an obvious and more sensible looking ridge ledge sort of thing 8-10 metres higher? He has enough rope and doesn't look like he's too tired or scared to continue. 

Not sure about that. 

> Can a person pull ~35m of dynamic rope upward with enough force to pull an adult man off his feet when the rope tangles around one of his feet?

I think the point here is that the 2 waiting to climb have taken their eyes off the ball somewhat, getting involved in bird watching and photography. Someone could be off balance when the rope is caught around a foot, causing them to fall when the rope is pulled upwards I would have thought. 

> Why aren't the seconds anchored to the mountain (although attached to each other by a few metres of rope?)

I thought they were, albeit on too long a bite, else how else do they not deck out.  

> The leader looks very concerned about the state of his two-point anchor using snapgates, although in the "emergency" it seems to become more solid when he adds the force of his quickly-rigged abseil, to the weight of the two seconds that had seemed to be threatening its integrity. 

Perhaps he's got a healthy dose of paranoia, always handy in climbing. I sometimes get worried about my anchors but learn to trust them as they appear to be doing the job. 

> And later in the film when they don't climb because it's raining, and leave their helmets behind "to save weight", why do they have a load of shovels? 

Sorry, I don't remember the shovels bit.

Personally, I think the film is a good effort in climbing terms. I don't remember "safe", or "off belay" in many other features. A bold move when you consider the majority of paying public may not understand the origins or significance of climbing calls.

1
In reply to Cog:

Just to add an extra large dose of pedantry why do all birds of prey make exactly the same noise in films 😁


New Topic
This topic has been archived, and won't accept reply postings.
Loading Notifications...