Pondering going from current 27.5 wheels and tyres to 27.5+ sizes.
However, came across a bike advertised running 29 front and 27.5+rear. My LBS does not have such combo to try out. Anyone running that setup have any views, pros and cons? Also, what is the best plus width for all round use?
Background: It would be a new bike so I am assuming the geometry would be built for the setup of different sized wheels/tyres. My current full sus mtb is an all mountain one so an all rounder and used in the hills, cross country, single trails, trail centres (incl reds) and the likes all for leisurely fun. I don’t do extremes but my bike has to cope with a variety of terrain incl rocks, small drop offs, tree roots, rough loose surfaces, undulating fast downs yet steep ups in moderation.
Trying to maintain a nimble capable all round bike, but improving rolling ability over tree roots/rocks, and more importantly comfort through less vibrations if this is possible without sacrificing too much! I had a 29er years ago, but much prefer the agility of my current 27.5 on 2.25 tyres.
On their medium and large sizes, Liteville spec 29er front / 27.5 rear. Normal size, not plus, but I reckon it can't be too bonkers if a super-thoughtful manufacturer like Liteville is doing it.
Thanks all, appreciated. I should get a test ride on a full 29er as it has been years since I was on one. Also, if I found a local shop that had a 29/27.5 to compare against tha would be great. More food for thought, thanks.
This topic has been archived, and won't accept reply postings.
Elsewhere on the site
Digital Feature An Oral History of the First Winter Ascent of K2
Product News Jetboil Stash all-in-one Stove System
Press Release Being a Field Guide in Antarctica
News UIAA to launch Mountain Worker Initiative
The UIAA has announced plans to establish a Mountain Worker Initiative with the aim of supporting people working in the expedition and trekking industry, prompted by the issues of low pay and poor working conditions raised in the documentary film The...