Thirlmere Zipwire Plans Dropped

© Mike Prince

A controversial planning application to build a zipwire attraction across Thirlmere in the Lake District has been withdrawn today.

The eight zip wires would have passed over the lake near Deergarth How Island  © Friends of the Lake District
The eight zip wires would have passed over the lake near Deergarth How Island
© Friends of the Lake District

The scheme submitted to local planners by local company Treetop Trek would have seen the creation of an 'activity hub', with eight zip wires up to 1200m long passing directly over Thirlmere.

The idea gave rise to a storm of protest. Conservation, walking and mountaineering groups including Friends of the Lake District (FLD), the BMC, the Fell and Rock Climbing Club and the Open Spaces Society were united in opposition, arguing that the development was profoundly unsuited to the location, and risked undermining the purpose of the National Park.

Local protests were held, and in an opinion piece on UKH Chris James of FLD reflected the strength of feeling - see here.

But according to the company, it was Ministry of Defence reservations about the danger to low-flying fighter aircraft that caused them to withdraw their existing planning application.

In a statement Mike Turner, Managing Director of Treetop Trek Ltd, said:

"We made it clear from the beginning of this process that we would not propose a scheme that was not supported by the MOD. To date we have received two contradictory communications with the MOD; one supporting the scheme and the other opposing the scheme."

"The MOD's internal investigation into Thirlmere and into what they would be happy with at Thirlmere is ongoing and unlikely to be resolved within the next eight weeks, so on that basis we are withdrawing the application."

It remains to be seen whether the company continues to pursue the proposal with a fresh planning application.

Friends of the Lake District, among others, campaigned against the proposals on the fundamental point that the location was inappropriate for this type of development.

"National Parks rightly have the highest level of landscape protection through the National Planning Policy Framework and this proposal flew in the face of the purposes of Nationals parks" they said in a statement released this afternoon.

"These special landscapes are the breathing spaces of our country, an opportunity for all to enjoy their unique qualities and restorative benefits for free and regardless of age."

"That is why we believe the Treetop Trek proposal was entirely inappropriate and would deprive future generations the opportunity to enjoy the Lake District National Park. It's a National Park that Friends of the Lake District campaigned for and one which we continue to fight for. We remain dedicated to protecting, enhancing and when called upon, defending the landscapes of the Lake District from threat."

"We welcome the Ministry of Defence's decision to object to this proposal and the subsequent withdrawal of the application by Treetop Trek."

"The same is true of the objection by Cumbria County Council Highways on public safety grounds. These are all issues we considered to be insurmountable by the applicant but, as it is outwith our remit as a landscape organisation, we did not object on these grounds. Our role is to highlight the importance of National Parks, the multi-faceted benefits we all gain, and the protection they have from inappropriate development."

"The withdrawal of this application due to technical reasons is of course positive but we would also draw attention to the many people who felt compelled to write to the Planning Authority to urge them to refuse this application because of the detrimental landscape impacts to the Lake District National Park and World Heritage Site."


This post has been read 12,163 times

Return to Latest News



20 Feb, 2018

They haven't abandoned the project, they've just withdrawn the current application as they couldn't reach an agreement with the MOD in time.

I'm sure that once they've done this they'll submit a new application. Anyone know whether existing objections will be carried over or binned? 

20 Feb, 2018

I good result, and hopefully one which will deter similar schemes in the future. I suspect that pointing to the MOD's concerns to justify withdrawing the plans was at least partly a face-saving exercise, and that the huge number of objections registered with the local authority made Treetop Trek realise that fighting on would be futile.

Now what is needed is some quality, sustainable sources of local employment for the area that don't treat the environment as a resource to be exploited.

Thanks Simon - we'd not appreciated that fine distinction. It's all in the small print! I've amended the piece to reflect that it's still unresolved longer term

20 Feb, 2018

How does that work then, when the entire tourism industry is based on maximising the landscape, and anything that upsets the hill walking crowds visual pleasure is objected to  ? 

20 Feb, 2018

I don't think they will be carried over as if they resubmit it will have a different application number, sometimes used as a tactic in local planning, not sure on something on this scale though.

 

More Comments
Loading Notifications...
Facebook Twitter Copy Email