Firstly I am assuming that Primaloft One is now Primaloft Gold, and Primaloft Eco is now Primaloft Silver Eco (i.e. they just changed the names) - I have no real evidence for this though so let me know if I am horribly wrong...
Is there are a big difference between the two fabrics? The only quantitative ratings I can find are comparing Primaloft One, Sport and Eco:
Primaloft One: 0.92 dry / 0.90 wet, clo/oz
Primaloft Sport: 0.79 dry /.72 wet, clo/oz
Primaloft Eco: 0.68 dry/ 0.60 wet, clo/oz
http://coldthistle.blogspot.co.uk/2012/11/primaloft.html
Converting 60 g/m^2 One and Eco into SI R values, you get (dry): 0.30 K m^2 / W and 0.22 K m^2 / W.
Or in ridiculous American units (like for sleeping mats etc): 1.71 hr ft^2 °F / Btu and 1.27 hr ft^2 °F / Btu.
This seems like quite a difference? I have been looking at the range of Montane synthetic jackets and they are (nearly) all [Silver] Eco, whereas Rab seem to have stuck with One(/Gold?). There is currently a women's Flux jacket going for £80-something in a local shop, but I am wondering whether with its (mostly) 100 g/m^2 fill it will be any warmer than say a Rab Xenon X hoodie which is only 60 g/m^2 but the better Primaloft fill. Just looking at the numbers 60 g/m^2 Primaloft One should be 80% as warm as 100 g/m^2 Primaloft Eco (i.e. probably hard to tell the difference), but the Xenon is 390g instead of 620g. Normally I get Montane stuff because it appeals to my slight perfectionism but I am just not really sure why they went a bit cheapskate on fabrics here - or maybe it makes little/no difference in practice? Just curious (and debating whether to grab the jacket if it really does fit!).